Equivalence checking paradigms in quantum circuit design: a case study

Tom Peham, Lukas Burgholzer, R. Wille
{"title":"Equivalence checking paradigms in quantum circuit design: a case study","authors":"Tom Peham, Lukas Burgholzer, R. Wille","doi":"10.1145/3489517.3530480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. However, there is no established baseline on which to judge current and future progress in equivalence checking of quantum circuits. In order to close this gap, we conduct a detailed case study of two of the most promising equivalence checking methodologies---one based on decision diagrams and one based on the ZX-calculus---and compare their strengths and weaknesses.","PeriodicalId":373005,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3489517.3530480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. However, there is no established baseline on which to judge current and future progress in equivalence checking of quantum circuits. In order to close this gap, we conduct a detailed case study of two of the most promising equivalence checking methodologies---one based on decision diagrams and one based on the ZX-calculus---and compare their strengths and weaknesses.
量子电路设计中的等效检验范例:个案研究
随着最先进的量子计算机能够运行越来越复杂的算法,对设计和测试潜在应用的自动化方法的需求也在上升。在量子软件栈的开发中,量子电路的等效性检查是一项重要的但很难自动化的任务。最近,人们提出了从不同角度解决这个问题的新方法。然而,对于量子电路等效性检验的当前和未来进展,并没有确定的基准来判断。为了缩小这一差距,我们对两种最有前途的等价性检查方法进行了详细的案例研究——一种基于决策图,另一种基于zx微积分——并比较了它们的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信