Performance comparison of RDI ADCPs: broadband versus narrowband

T. C. Wilson, K. Lwiza, G. L. Allen
{"title":"Performance comparison of RDI ADCPs: broadband versus narrowband","authors":"T. C. Wilson, K. Lwiza, G. L. Allen","doi":"10.1109/OCEANS.1997.634347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \"broadband\" acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) manufactured by RD Instruments of San Diego CA can potentially greatly enhance the temporal and spatial resolution of underway current measurements relative to older \"narrowband\" ADCP technology. Despite this, adoption of broadband ADCPs has been slow in the US national research vessel fleet operated by the University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System (UNOLS). Narrowband ADCPs are now considered \"standard equipment\" in UNOLS intermediate and large class vessels. Adoption of the potentially superior newer technology has been delayed by a lack of rigorous intercomparison studies between the narrowband and broadband ADCP, plus some anecdotal evidence of decreased performance when substituting a broadband for a narrowband (such as significantly decreased profiling range). A series of intercomparison experiments were performed aboard the Research Vessel Seward Johnson during month-long cruises in May 1996 and May 1997 in the vicinity of Barbados, West Indies. The instruments involved were narrowband 150 kHz and broadband 150 kHz vessel mounted ADCPs. The two ADCPs were set up in as similar a manner as possible to provide the most valid intercomparison. In order to avoid any possible interference between ADCP systems experiments were run in time-interleaved fashion. Results showed that the broadband ADCP produced data quality superior to the narrowband under similar conditions. Profiling range in broadband water profiling mode 7 was equal to that of the narrowband. In broadband modes 4 and 1, profiling ranges averaged 78% and 75% of narrowband ranges respectively. Ensemble to ensemble variation of speed at 57 meters depth averaged 13.26 cm/sec for the narrowband versus 6.16 cm/sec for broadband mode 7 and 4.80 cm/sec for broadband mode 4. Broadband water profiling mode 7 provides profiling ranges equal to a narrowband of the same frequency with increased data accuracy, while water profiling mode 4 provides even greater data accuracy with only a loss of 20-25% in range.","PeriodicalId":259593,"journal":{"name":"Oceans '97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oceans '97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1997.634347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The "broadband" acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) manufactured by RD Instruments of San Diego CA can potentially greatly enhance the temporal and spatial resolution of underway current measurements relative to older "narrowband" ADCP technology. Despite this, adoption of broadband ADCPs has been slow in the US national research vessel fleet operated by the University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System (UNOLS). Narrowband ADCPs are now considered "standard equipment" in UNOLS intermediate and large class vessels. Adoption of the potentially superior newer technology has been delayed by a lack of rigorous intercomparison studies between the narrowband and broadband ADCP, plus some anecdotal evidence of decreased performance when substituting a broadband for a narrowband (such as significantly decreased profiling range). A series of intercomparison experiments were performed aboard the Research Vessel Seward Johnson during month-long cruises in May 1996 and May 1997 in the vicinity of Barbados, West Indies. The instruments involved were narrowband 150 kHz and broadband 150 kHz vessel mounted ADCPs. The two ADCPs were set up in as similar a manner as possible to provide the most valid intercomparison. In order to avoid any possible interference between ADCP systems experiments were run in time-interleaved fashion. Results showed that the broadband ADCP produced data quality superior to the narrowband under similar conditions. Profiling range in broadband water profiling mode 7 was equal to that of the narrowband. In broadband modes 4 and 1, profiling ranges averaged 78% and 75% of narrowband ranges respectively. Ensemble to ensemble variation of speed at 57 meters depth averaged 13.26 cm/sec for the narrowband versus 6.16 cm/sec for broadband mode 7 and 4.80 cm/sec for broadband mode 4. Broadband water profiling mode 7 provides profiling ranges equal to a narrowband of the same frequency with increased data accuracy, while water profiling mode 4 provides even greater data accuracy with only a loss of 20-25% in range.
RDI adcp的性能比较:宽带与窄带
与旧的“窄带”ADCP技术相比,由加州圣地亚哥RD仪器公司制造的“宽带”声学多普勒电流剖面仪(ADCP)可以极大地提高正在进行的电流测量的时间和空间分辨率。尽管如此,宽带adcp的采用在由大学-国家海洋实验室系统(UNOLS)运营的美国国家研究船队中进展缓慢。窄带adcp现在被认为是联卢特派团中型和大型船只的“标准设备”。由于窄带和宽带ADCP之间缺乏严格的相互比较研究,再加上一些轶事证据表明,用宽带代替窄带会降低性能(例如显着降低分析范围),因此可能会推迟采用具有潜在优势的新技术。1996年5月和1997年5月,在西印度群岛巴巴多斯附近为期一个月的巡航期间,在苏厄德·约翰逊号科考船上进行了一系列相互比较实验。所涉及的仪器是窄带150千赫和宽带150千赫装在船上的adcp。两个adcp以尽可能相似的方式设置,以提供最有效的相互比较。为了避免ADCP系统之间可能存在的干扰,实验采用时间交错方式进行。结果表明,在相同条件下,宽带ADCP产生的数据质量优于窄带ADCP。宽带水剖面模式7与窄带水剖面模式7的剖面范围相等。在宽带模式4和1中,剖面范围平均分别为窄带范围的78%和75%。在57米深度处,窄带组间的速度变化平均为13.26 cm/秒,而宽带模式7为6.16 cm/秒,宽带模式4为4.80 cm/秒。宽带水剖面模式7提供了与窄带相同频率的剖面范围,提高了数据精度,而水剖面模式4提供了更高的数据精度,仅损失了20-25%的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信