Guarantees of the Admissibility and Validity of the Rejection of Subjective Law in Criminal Proceedings: Problems of Legislative Regulation

I. Chebotareva, O. Pashutina, I. Revina
{"title":"Guarantees of the Admissibility and Validity of the Rejection of Subjective Law in Criminal Proceedings: Problems of Legislative Regulation","authors":"I. Chebotareva, O. Pashutina, I. Revina","doi":"10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-6-113-131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. An element of the human rights system is the criminal procedure law, which allows to increase the degree of protection of the rights of persons in the field of criminal proceedings. The norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation specify a significant change in the attitude of the state towards the individual, however, many provisions of the law remain imperfect, which gives rise to cases of violation of individual rights in criminal proceedings, emphasizes the importance of studying the issues of legal regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law. Purpose: the study of the problems of regulatory regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law, the development of proposals for further improvement of the criminal procedure law. Objective: to study the totality of the norms of the criminal procedure law that enshrine the guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the waiver of the right, doctrinal sources, in the part related to the topic of the study. Methodology. The basis of this research is a combination of the universal dialectical method of scientific cogni-tion, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, and private scientific methods of cognition, such as: formal-logical, formal-legal. The authors also used methods of studying social phenomena in their concrete manifestation in specific conditions of place and time: the study of documents, observation. Results. A significant element in the hierarchical chain of the regulatory component, which forms the basis of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law, is the criminal procedure law. Many of its provisions are aimed at ensuring the possibility of a person who has fallen into the sphere of criminal proceedings to express his will regarding the realization/non-realization of the benefits belonging to him. At the same time, the work of the legislator in this regard cannot be considered completed. Conclusion. Improving the legal regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of sub-jective law will contribute to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, correspond to the purpose of criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":359562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","volume":"69 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-6-113-131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. An element of the human rights system is the criminal procedure law, which allows to increase the degree of protection of the rights of persons in the field of criminal proceedings. The norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation specify a significant change in the attitude of the state towards the individual, however, many provisions of the law remain imperfect, which gives rise to cases of violation of individual rights in criminal proceedings, emphasizes the importance of studying the issues of legal regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law. Purpose: the study of the problems of regulatory regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law, the development of proposals for further improvement of the criminal procedure law. Objective: to study the totality of the norms of the criminal procedure law that enshrine the guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the waiver of the right, doctrinal sources, in the part related to the topic of the study. Methodology. The basis of this research is a combination of the universal dialectical method of scientific cogni-tion, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, and private scientific methods of cognition, such as: formal-logical, formal-legal. The authors also used methods of studying social phenomena in their concrete manifestation in specific conditions of place and time: the study of documents, observation. Results. A significant element in the hierarchical chain of the regulatory component, which forms the basis of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law, is the criminal procedure law. Many of its provisions are aimed at ensuring the possibility of a person who has fallen into the sphere of criminal proceedings to express his will regarding the realization/non-realization of the benefits belonging to him. At the same time, the work of the legislator in this regard cannot be considered completed. Conclusion. Improving the legal regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of sub-jective law will contribute to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, correspond to the purpose of criminal proceedings.
刑事诉讼中主观法否定的可采性与有效性保障:立法规制问题
的相关性。人权制度的一个组成部分是刑事诉讼法,它允许在刑事诉讼领域增加对人的权利的保护程度。俄罗斯联邦《刑事诉讼法》的规范规定了国家对个人态度的重大变化,然而,法律的许多条款仍然不完善,这导致了刑事诉讼中侵犯个人权利的案件,强调了研究法律规制保障可采性和拒绝主观法的有效性问题的重要性。目的:研究我国现行刑事诉讼法规制中存在的问题,为我国刑事诉讼法的进一步完善提出建议。目的:在与研究课题相关的部分,研究我国刑事诉讼法中保障放弃权利的可采性和有效性的规范的总体、理论来源。方法。本研究的基础是科学认知的普遍辩证方法、分析综合、归纳演绎的一般科学方法和形式-逻辑、形式-法律等私人科学认知方法的结合。作者还运用了研究社会现象在特定地点和时间条件下具体表现的方法:文献研究、观察法。结果。刑事诉讼法是构成对主观法的否定的可采性和有效性保证的基础的规制部分的等级链中的一个重要组成部分。它的许多条款旨在确保陷入刑事诉讼范围的人有可能就实现/不实现属于他的利益表达他的意愿。与此同时,立法者在这方面的工作不能认为已经完成。结论。完善对主体法拒绝的可采性和有效性保障的法律规制,有利于保护公民的合法权益,符合刑事诉讼的宗旨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信