The impact of color composition on X-ray image interpretation in aviation security screening

C. C. von Bastian, A. Schwaninger, S. Michel
{"title":"The impact of color composition on X-ray image interpretation in aviation security screening","authors":"C. C. von Bastian, A. Schwaninger, S. Michel","doi":"10.1109/CCST.2009.5335539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve aviation security, many airports apply Threat Image Projection (TIP) and computer-based X-ray image interpretation training (CBT). One difference between TIP and CBT X-ray images is the algorithm used to merge virtual threat items into X-ray images of passenger bags, resulting in different color nuances. In this study, we tested the influence of merging algorithms on threat object detection performance, reaction time and confidence rating of 12 airport security screeners. The image merging algorithms of the individually adaptive CBT X-Ray Tutor were used. We have found that the hit rate was higher for TIP images compared to CBT images. Accordingly, the mean of confidence ratings was increased for TIP images. The reaction times tended to be shorter for TIP images. The results of our study indicate that the CBT merging algorithm used in this study is more realistic than the tested TIP image merging algorithm.","PeriodicalId":117285,"journal":{"name":"43rd Annual 2009 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"43rd Annual 2009 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2009.5335539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In order to improve aviation security, many airports apply Threat Image Projection (TIP) and computer-based X-ray image interpretation training (CBT). One difference between TIP and CBT X-ray images is the algorithm used to merge virtual threat items into X-ray images of passenger bags, resulting in different color nuances. In this study, we tested the influence of merging algorithms on threat object detection performance, reaction time and confidence rating of 12 airport security screeners. The image merging algorithms of the individually adaptive CBT X-Ray Tutor were used. We have found that the hit rate was higher for TIP images compared to CBT images. Accordingly, the mean of confidence ratings was increased for TIP images. The reaction times tended to be shorter for TIP images. The results of our study indicate that the CBT merging algorithm used in this study is more realistic than the tested TIP image merging algorithm.
航空安检中彩色成分对x射线图像判读的影响
为了提高航空安全,许多机场采用威胁图像投影(TIP)和基于计算机的x射线图像判读训练(CBT)。TIP和CBT x射线图像之间的一个区别是,该算法用于将虚拟威胁物品合并到乘客行李的x射线图像中,从而产生不同的颜色细微差别。在本研究中,我们测试了合并算法对12个机场安检设备的威胁目标检测性能、反应时间和置信度评级的影响。采用CBT X-Ray Tutor的自适应图像合并算法。我们发现TIP图像的命中率比CBT图像高。因此,对于TIP图像,置信度评级的平均值增加。对于TIP图像,反应时间往往更短。研究结果表明,本文所采用的CBT合并算法比已测试的TIP图像合并算法更具有真实感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信