Trading schemes for greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture : A comparative analysis based on different implementation options

I. P. Domínguez, W. Britz, K. Holm-Müller
{"title":"Trading schemes for greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture : A comparative analysis based on different implementation options","authors":"I. P. Domínguez, W. Britz, K. Holm-Müller","doi":"10.3406/reae.2009.1973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rational negotiation strategy for coming multilateral negotiations regarding climate change requires knowledge about possible social, economic and environmental effects of policy instruments for the abatement of greenhouse gas emissions. With this purpose, an agricultural sector model is expanded to cover greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural sources in Europe and policy instruments for their reduction. This modelling approach concentrates on the application of a permit trade scheme for emission abatement within the Kyoto Protocol ‘first commitment’ baseline. The effects derived of three alternative schemes are described in detail: the EU ‘burden sharing’ agreement option defined as regional emission standards, emission trading between regions inside each Member State, and finally, emission trading between all European regions. The analysis shows the importance of selecting an adequate combination of instruments of emission abatement for the design of efficient emission reduction policies","PeriodicalId":170092,"journal":{"name":"Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/reae.2009.1973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

A rational negotiation strategy for coming multilateral negotiations regarding climate change requires knowledge about possible social, economic and environmental effects of policy instruments for the abatement of greenhouse gas emissions. With this purpose, an agricultural sector model is expanded to cover greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural sources in Europe and policy instruments for their reduction. This modelling approach concentrates on the application of a permit trade scheme for emission abatement within the Kyoto Protocol ‘first commitment’ baseline. The effects derived of three alternative schemes are described in detail: the EU ‘burden sharing’ agreement option defined as regional emission standards, emission trading between regions inside each Member State, and finally, emission trading between all European regions. The analysis shows the importance of selecting an adequate combination of instruments of emission abatement for the design of efficient emission reduction policies
欧洲农业温室气体排放交易方案:基于不同实施方案的比较分析
为即将到来的关于气候变化的多边谈判制定合理的谈判战略,需要了解减少温室气体排放的政策工具可能产生的社会、经济和环境影响。为此目的,扩大了农业部门模式,以涵盖欧洲农业来源的温室气体排放和减少温室气体排放的政策工具。这种建模方法侧重于在《京都议定书》“第一承诺”基线范围内实施许可贸易计划以减少排放。详细描述了三种替代方案的影响:定义为区域排放标准的欧盟“负担分担”协议选项,每个成员国内部区域之间的排放交易,以及所有欧洲区域之间的排放交易。分析表明,选择适当的减少排放手段组合对于设计有效的减少排放政策十分重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信