Guidelines for Architecting Android Apps: A Mixed-Method Empirical Study

R. Verdecchia, I. Malavolta, P. Lago
{"title":"Guidelines for Architecting Android Apps: A Mixed-Method Empirical Study","authors":"R. Verdecchia, I. Malavolta, P. Lago","doi":"10.1109/ICSA.2019.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For surviving in the highly competitive market of Android apps, it is fundamental for app developers to deliver apps of high quality and with short release times. A well-architected Android app is beneficial for developers, e.g. in terms of maintainability, testability, performance, and avoidance of resource leaks. However, how to properly architect Android apps is still debated and subject to conflicting opinions usually influenced by technological hypes rather than objective evidence. In this paper we present an empirical study on how developers architect Android apps, what architectural patterns and practices Android apps are based on, and their potential impact on quality. We apply a mixed-method empirical research design that combines (i) semi-structured interviews with Android practitioners in the field and (ii) a systematic analysis of both the grey (i.e., websites, Online blogs) and white literature (i.e., academic studies) on the architecture of Android apps. Based on the analysis of the state of the art and practice about architecting Android apps, we systematically extract a set of 42 evidence-based guidelines supporting developers when architecting their Android apps.","PeriodicalId":426352,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA.2019.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

For surviving in the highly competitive market of Android apps, it is fundamental for app developers to deliver apps of high quality and with short release times. A well-architected Android app is beneficial for developers, e.g. in terms of maintainability, testability, performance, and avoidance of resource leaks. However, how to properly architect Android apps is still debated and subject to conflicting opinions usually influenced by technological hypes rather than objective evidence. In this paper we present an empirical study on how developers architect Android apps, what architectural patterns and practices Android apps are based on, and their potential impact on quality. We apply a mixed-method empirical research design that combines (i) semi-structured interviews with Android practitioners in the field and (ii) a systematic analysis of both the grey (i.e., websites, Online blogs) and white literature (i.e., academic studies) on the architecture of Android apps. Based on the analysis of the state of the art and practice about architecting Android apps, we systematically extract a set of 42 evidence-based guidelines supporting developers when architecting their Android apps.
Android应用架构指南:混合方法实证研究
为了在竞争激烈的Android应用市场中生存下来,应用开发者必须在短时间内推出高质量的应用。一个架构良好的Android应用程序对开发人员是有益的,例如在可维护性、可测试性、性能和避免资源泄漏方面。然而,如何正确地构建Android应用程序仍然存在争议,并且通常受到技术炒作而不是客观证据的影响而受到相互矛盾的意见的影响。在本文中,我们对开发者如何构建Android应用程序、Android应用程序基于什么架构模式和实践以及它们对质量的潜在影响进行了实证研究。我们采用混合方法的实证研究设计,结合了(i)与该领域的Android从业者的半结构化访谈和(ii)对Android应用程序架构的灰色(即网站,在线博客)和白色文献(即学术研究)的系统分析。基于对构建Android应用的现状和实践的分析,我们系统地提取了42条基于证据的指导原则,以支持开发者构建他们的Android应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信