Giving as “De-Risking”: Philanthropy, Impact Investment and the Pandemic Response

Jessica Sklair, P. Gilbert
{"title":"Giving as “De-Risking”: Philanthropy, Impact Investment and the Pandemic Response","authors":"Jessica Sklair, P. Gilbert","doi":"10.1163/25891715-bja10033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article examines the role played by philanthrocapitalist foundations in impact investing for international development, focusing on the covid-19 Vaccines Global Access Initiative (covax) as a response to the current pandemic. Philanthrocapitalists and development institutions are increasingly turning to “blended finance” and “social bonds” to address the gaps in funding required to meet global development agendas, particularly in the arena of global health. These impact investing mechanisms deploy public or philanthropic money to leverage for-profit investment in development, by “de-risking” (providing guarantees for) interventions that might otherwise put private capital at risk. Via covax, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has platformed a pandemic response centred on this approach, resisting alternative responses – such as the proposal for a temporary waiver to pharmaceutical patent rights – that seek to challenge the prevailing trade architecture. The global policy response to covid-19 thus accelerates the “financialization” of development and cements the role of philanthropy in “de-risking” for-profit impact investment.","PeriodicalId":108830,"journal":{"name":"Public Anthropologist","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-bja10033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article examines the role played by philanthrocapitalist foundations in impact investing for international development, focusing on the covid-19 Vaccines Global Access Initiative (covax) as a response to the current pandemic. Philanthrocapitalists and development institutions are increasingly turning to “blended finance” and “social bonds” to address the gaps in funding required to meet global development agendas, particularly in the arena of global health. These impact investing mechanisms deploy public or philanthropic money to leverage for-profit investment in development, by “de-risking” (providing guarantees for) interventions that might otherwise put private capital at risk. Via covax, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has platformed a pandemic response centred on this approach, resisting alternative responses – such as the proposal for a temporary waiver to pharmaceutical patent rights – that seek to challenge the prevailing trade architecture. The global policy response to covid-19 thus accelerates the “financialization” of development and cements the role of philanthropy in “de-risking” for-profit impact investment.
以“去风险”的方式给予:慈善事业、影响力投资和大流行应对
本文考察了慈善资本主义基金会在影响投资促进国际发展方面发挥的作用,重点介绍了应对当前大流行的covid-19疫苗全球获取倡议(covax)。慈善资本家和发展机构越来越多地转向"混合融资"和"社会债券",以填补满足全球发展议程,特别是在全球卫生领域所需资金的缺口。这些影响力投资机制利用公共或慈善资金,通过“去风险”(为可能使私人资本面临风险的干预措施提供担保),撬动营利性发展投资。比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会通过covid - 19疫苗获取计划,为以这种方法为中心的大流行应对提供了平台,抵制其他应对措施——例如暂时放弃药品专利权的提议——这些措施试图挑战现行的贸易结构。因此,全球应对covid-19的政策加速了发展的“金融化”,巩固了慈善事业在“去风险”营利性影响力投资中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信