Public Administration in the Political and Legal Space of Modern Ukraine: European Choice and Effectiveness

E. V. Okhotsky, Охотский Евгений Васильевич
{"title":"Public Administration in the Political and Legal Space of Modern Ukraine: European Choice and Effectiveness","authors":"E. V. Okhotsky, Охотский Евгений Васильевич","doi":"10.17816/rjls18482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article, which consists of two parts, explores the problems of the political and legal foundations of goal-setting and the effectiveness of public administration in modern Ukraine, assesses the significance of the constructiveness of the implementation outlined in the context of public interest and state growth strategy. An attempt was also made to prove that the existence of scientifically substantiated goals, their systematic nature, strategic and functional validity are the basic features of a state of law and an indispensable condition for the high quality of public administration. It is also taken into account that the concepts of “effective” and “efficiency” are perceived ambiguously in science and everyday management practice. For some, it is effective that it is desirable and expedient, for others, only that allows them to realize their intentions and satisfy their respective needs, for others, it ensures that the desired result is obtained at the lowest cost. It also touches on the difficulties of making effective managerial decisions in the difficult conditions of modern reality, in a situation where there are no strict methodological guidelines and the corresponding legal, organizational, procedural and heuristic algorithms, not populous moral principles dominate, but populist blur. The presence in such conditions of only normatively approved","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article, which consists of two parts, explores the problems of the political and legal foundations of goal-setting and the effectiveness of public administration in modern Ukraine, assesses the significance of the constructiveness of the implementation outlined in the context of public interest and state growth strategy. An attempt was also made to prove that the existence of scientifically substantiated goals, their systematic nature, strategic and functional validity are the basic features of a state of law and an indispensable condition for the high quality of public administration. It is also taken into account that the concepts of “effective” and “efficiency” are perceived ambiguously in science and everyday management practice. For some, it is effective that it is desirable and expedient, for others, only that allows them to realize their intentions and satisfy their respective needs, for others, it ensures that the desired result is obtained at the lowest cost. It also touches on the difficulties of making effective managerial decisions in the difficult conditions of modern reality, in a situation where there are no strict methodological guidelines and the corresponding legal, organizational, procedural and heuristic algorithms, not populous moral principles dominate, but populist blur. The presence in such conditions of only normatively approved
现代乌克兰政治与法律空间中的公共行政:欧洲的选择与有效性
本文由两部分组成,探讨了目标设定的政治和法律基础问题以及现代乌克兰公共行政的有效性,评估了在公共利益和国家增长战略背景下实施的建设性意义。还试图证明,有科学依据的目标的存在、它们的系统性质、战略和功能有效性是法治国家的基本特征,也是公共行政高质量的必要条件。它还考虑到,在科学和日常管理实践中,“有效”和“效率”的概念是模糊的。对一些人来说,它是有效的,因为它是可取的和有利的,对另一些人来说,只有它能让他们实现他们的意图并满足他们各自的需求,对另一些人来说,它确保以最低的成本获得预期的结果。它还触及了在现代现实的困难条件下做出有效管理决策的困难,在没有严格的方法指导方针和相应的法律、组织、程序和启发式算法的情况下,不是大量的道德原则占主导地位,而是民粹主义模糊。在这种情况下的存在只有规范性的批准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信