Dynamics and Statics

Bysshe Inigo Coffey
{"title":"Dynamics and Statics","authors":"Bysshe Inigo Coffey","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1r1nr2h.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 2 continues and diversifies the argument of its predecessor by focusing on debates over Newtonian axioms concerning motion, particularly the rival visions of Spinoza’s conatus and Newton’s vis inertiae. It examines how they inform Shelley’s essay draft of 1818, ‘A Future State’, in which Shelley advances an implied critique of conatus. In this the idea that thought might be some ‘peculiar substance’ is clearly articulated, a view with which Shelley remained fascinated as a creative possibility, without giving it his intellectual assent.","PeriodicalId":134914,"journal":{"name":"Shelley's Broken World","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shelley's Broken World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1r1nr2h.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 2 continues and diversifies the argument of its predecessor by focusing on debates over Newtonian axioms concerning motion, particularly the rival visions of Spinoza’s conatus and Newton’s vis inertiae. It examines how they inform Shelley’s essay draft of 1818, ‘A Future State’, in which Shelley advances an implied critique of conatus. In this the idea that thought might be some ‘peculiar substance’ is clearly articulated, a view with which Shelley remained fascinated as a creative possibility, without giving it his intellectual assent.
动力学与静力学
第二章通过集中讨论关于运动的牛顿公理,特别是斯宾诺莎的conatus和牛顿的视惯性的对立观点,继续并使其前作的论点多样化。它考察了它们如何影响雪莱1818年的论文草稿,“未来的状态”,其中雪莱提出了对conatus的隐含批评。在这本书中,思想可能是某种“特殊物质”的观点被清晰地表达了出来,雪莱对这种观点一直着迷,认为它是一种创造性的可能性,但没有给予他的智力上的赞同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信