Systematic Review on Cybersecurity Risks and Behaviours: Methodological Approaches

E. Oliveira, Vania Baldi
{"title":"Systematic Review on Cybersecurity Risks and Behaviours: Methodological Approaches","authors":"E. Oliveira, Vania Baldi","doi":"10.5220/0010762600003197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a systematic literature review regarding risk perception and precautionary behaviour related to cybersecurity. Objectives encompassed identifying issues related to methodological approaches, the studies’ operationalisation and other essential topics, highlighting significant gaps to be fulfilled in future investigations. The study included a search in the multidisciplinary databases of Science Direct, Web of Science, and the Scientific Repositories of Open Access in Portugal, focusing on publications after 2016. A total of nine articles were analysed. The review was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols’ research method. Also, publications were coded using the NVivo 12 software for synthesising the results. The small number of studies considered for analysis revealed that risk perception and precautionary behaviour concerning cybersecurity is still an under-explored study area. Furthermore, methodological gaps are highlighted for future works. Studies in the cybersecurity field provide a dataset for policymakers, directing efforts and predicting responses to digital technologies, making this subject matter highly substantial.","PeriodicalId":414016,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0010762600003197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review regarding risk perception and precautionary behaviour related to cybersecurity. Objectives encompassed identifying issues related to methodological approaches, the studies’ operationalisation and other essential topics, highlighting significant gaps to be fulfilled in future investigations. The study included a search in the multidisciplinary databases of Science Direct, Web of Science, and the Scientific Repositories of Open Access in Portugal, focusing on publications after 2016. A total of nine articles were analysed. The review was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols’ research method. Also, publications were coded using the NVivo 12 software for synthesising the results. The small number of studies considered for analysis revealed that risk perception and precautionary behaviour concerning cybersecurity is still an under-explored study area. Furthermore, methodological gaps are highlighted for future works. Studies in the cybersecurity field provide a dataset for policymakers, directing efforts and predicting responses to digital technologies, making this subject matter highly substantial.
网络安全风险与行为的系统回顾:方法论方法
本文对网络安全相关的风险感知和预防行为进行了系统的文献综述。目标包括确定与方法方法、研究的可操作性和其他基本主题相关的问题,强调在未来调查中需要填补的重大空白。该研究包括在Science Direct、Web of Science和葡萄牙开放获取科学知识库的多学科数据库中进行搜索,重点关注2016年之后的出版物。共分析了9篇文章。本综述采用系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析方案的研究方法。此外,使用NVivo 12软件对出版物进行编码以合成结果。考虑用于分析的少数研究表明,与网络安全有关的风险感知和预防行为仍然是一个未开发的研究领域。此外,还强调了未来工作的方法差距。网络安全领域的研究为政策制定者提供了一个数据集,指导工作和预测对数字技术的反应,使这一主题非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信