Perception of Medical Students and Doctors on Osteology Education

Jae-Hee Park, Sang-Hun Lee, J. Jeon, W. Choi, G. Kim, Jae-Ho Lee
{"title":"Perception of Medical Students and Doctors on Osteology Education","authors":"Jae-Hee Park, Sang-Hun Lee, J. Jeon, W. Choi, G. Kim, Jae-Ho Lee","doi":"10.11637/ABA.2021.34.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anatomy is being taught as a compulsory subject in various health care-related occupations. In anatomy, osteology is learning the names of bones and offers detailed structure of each bone and clinical knowledge. Therefore, understanding of bones is needed to learn the names of muscles, nerves, and blood vessels attached to each bone, and helps to remember the basic structure and function of human body. This study investigated the need for osteological learning and conducted a survey on medical students and doctors with experience in anatomy to identify the problems of osteological education. According to the result of conducting a survey on 186 people, doctors showed higher positive opinion on lectures, exams, and grades of osteology than medical students but did not show a statistically significant difference. Doctors showed higher positive opinions about osteological practice than medical students, and showed statistically significant difference (p=0.037). Senior teaching (41.8%) was selected as the biggest problem in osteological education today followed by a short lecture, lack model, lack of study hours, and examination. Also, students had little difficulty in learning chest, spine, and limbs but showed difficulty in learning pelvis especially the head and required a lot of learning time. It was identified that more time is needed for doctors than for medical students in every system and showed a significant difference. This study suggests the necessity of formal education for osteology education and that combining lecture on theory and practice can raise learning effect of anatomy in effective osteology education.","PeriodicalId":356245,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy & Biological Anthropology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy & Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11637/ABA.2021.34.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anatomy is being taught as a compulsory subject in various health care-related occupations. In anatomy, osteology is learning the names of bones and offers detailed structure of each bone and clinical knowledge. Therefore, understanding of bones is needed to learn the names of muscles, nerves, and blood vessels attached to each bone, and helps to remember the basic structure and function of human body. This study investigated the need for osteological learning and conducted a survey on medical students and doctors with experience in anatomy to identify the problems of osteological education. According to the result of conducting a survey on 186 people, doctors showed higher positive opinion on lectures, exams, and grades of osteology than medical students but did not show a statistically significant difference. Doctors showed higher positive opinions about osteological practice than medical students, and showed statistically significant difference (p=0.037). Senior teaching (41.8%) was selected as the biggest problem in osteological education today followed by a short lecture, lack model, lack of study hours, and examination. Also, students had little difficulty in learning chest, spine, and limbs but showed difficulty in learning pelvis especially the head and required a lot of learning time. It was identified that more time is needed for doctors than for medical students in every system and showed a significant difference. This study suggests the necessity of formal education for osteology education and that combining lecture on theory and practice can raise learning effect of anatomy in effective osteology education.
医学生和医生对骨科教育的看法
在各种与卫生保健有关的职业中,解剖学是一门必修课。在解剖学中,骨学是学习骨骼的名称,并提供每个骨骼的详细结构和临床知识。因此,要了解骨骼,就必须了解附着在每块骨骼上的肌肉、神经和血管的名称,并有助于记住人体的基本结构和功能。本研究调查了骨科学习的必要性,并对医学生和有解剖学经验的医生进行了调查,以确定骨科教育的问题。对186人进行问卷调查的结果显示,医生对讲座、考试、骨科成绩的评价比医科学生高,但没有统计学上的显著差异。医师对骨科实习的积极评价高于医学生,差异有统计学意义(p=0.037)。目前骨学教育存在的最大问题是高级教学(41.8%),其次是讲课时间短、缺乏模式、学习时数少和考试。此外,学生在学习胸部、脊柱和四肢方面没有什么困难,但在学习骨盆尤其是头部方面表现出困难,需要大量的学习时间。在每个系统中,医生比医学生需要更多的时间,并显示出显著差异。本研究提出骨学教育必须进行正规教育,理论与实践相结合的讲授可以在有效的骨学教育中提高解剖学的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信