Performance assessment to assess students’ interpretation in chemistry learning

B. Utami, S. Saputro, Ashadi, M. Masykuri, S. Widoretno
{"title":"Performance assessment to assess students’ interpretation in chemistry learning","authors":"B. Utami, S. Saputro, Ashadi, M. Masykuri, S. Widoretno","doi":"10.1063/1.5139867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking skills are 21st century skills needed by students to be able to compete in the era of globalization. The components of critical thinking according to Facione are interpretation, analysis, explanation, evaluation, conclusion, and self-regulation. This study was aimed to identify critical thinking skills in aspects of interpretation using performance assessment rubric. Indicators of critical thinking skills aspects of interpretation consisted of five indicators: interpretation based on experience, interpretation based on data, interpretation based on events, interpretation based on procedures and interpretation based on judgment. The RASCH was used in data analysis. The samples were 120 students selected from one of senior high school in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. The performance assessment instrument was analyzed with the RASCH model. The performance assessment to assess interpretation skills were analyzed with the RASCH model showing the instruments was good. The results showed the students still have difficulties in interpretation based on procedure and judgment. This illustrates the importance of empowering students’ critical thinking skills in the interpretation component.","PeriodicalId":246056,"journal":{"name":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical thinking skills are 21st century skills needed by students to be able to compete in the era of globalization. The components of critical thinking according to Facione are interpretation, analysis, explanation, evaluation, conclusion, and self-regulation. This study was aimed to identify critical thinking skills in aspects of interpretation using performance assessment rubric. Indicators of critical thinking skills aspects of interpretation consisted of five indicators: interpretation based on experience, interpretation based on data, interpretation based on events, interpretation based on procedures and interpretation based on judgment. The RASCH was used in data analysis. The samples were 120 students selected from one of senior high school in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. The performance assessment instrument was analyzed with the RASCH model. The performance assessment to assess interpretation skills were analyzed with the RASCH model showing the instruments was good. The results showed the students still have difficulties in interpretation based on procedure and judgment. This illustrates the importance of empowering students’ critical thinking skills in the interpretation component.
评估学生在化学学习中的诠释能力
批判性思维技能是21世纪学生在全球化时代竞争所需要的技能。根据Facione的观点,批判性思维的组成部分是解释、分析、解释、评价、结论和自我调节。本研究旨在使用绩效评估量表来确定口译方面的批判性思维技能。口译批判性思维技能方面的指标包括五个指标:基于经验的口译、基于数据的口译、基于事件的口译、基于程序的口译和基于判断的口译。数据分析采用RASCH。本研究选取了印度尼西亚中爪哇省苏拉卡塔市一所高中的120名学生作为样本。采用RASCH模型对性能评价仪进行了分析。用RASCH模型分析了评估口译技能的性能评估,表明仪器是良好的。结果表明,学生在基于程序和判断的口译方面仍然存在困难。这说明了在口译部分培养学生批判性思维能力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信