The value of publishing negative studies: Introducing IJS Short Reports

R. Agha
{"title":"The value of publishing negative studies: Introducing IJS Short Reports","authors":"R. Agha","doi":"10.4103/2468-7332.186170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2016 International Journal of Surgery Short Reports | Published by Wolters Kluwer Medknow in the correct direction, aid collaboration, and prevent duplication and wasted resources. Other issues our community grapples with are underpowered studies, poor statistical methods, poor reproducibility and external validity, and poor methodology and reporting of studies. Publishing negative results bring the focus away from the results themselves to the research questions, the hypothesis and the robustness of the methodology used to investigate it. Such studies are all too often rejected by journals due to the direction of their results, rather than the quality of the methodology and the data and the contextual significance of the research questions they answer.","PeriodicalId":331041,"journal":{"name":"IJS Short Reports","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJS Short Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2468-7332.186170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

© 2016 International Journal of Surgery Short Reports | Published by Wolters Kluwer Medknow in the correct direction, aid collaboration, and prevent duplication and wasted resources. Other issues our community grapples with are underpowered studies, poor statistical methods, poor reproducibility and external validity, and poor methodology and reporting of studies. Publishing negative results bring the focus away from the results themselves to the research questions, the hypothesis and the robustness of the methodology used to investigate it. Such studies are all too often rejected by journals due to the direction of their results, rather than the quality of the methodology and the data and the contextual significance of the research questions they answer.
发表负面研究的价值:IJS短报告简介
©2016国际外科杂志短报告|由威科集团出版,了解正确的方向,帮助合作,防止重复和浪费资源。我们的社区努力解决的其他问题是研究力度不足,统计方法不完善,可重复性和外部有效性差,研究方法和报告不完善。发表负面结果将焦点从结果本身转移到研究问题、假设和用于调查它的方法的稳健性上。这类研究经常因为其结果的方向而被期刊拒绝,而不是因为其方法和数据的质量以及它们所回答的研究问题的背景意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信