Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice.

J. J. Boyle, V. Katz
{"title":"Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice.","authors":"J. J. Boyle, V. Katz","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000182901.55517.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo assess the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nThis study was a retrospective chart review at both a community hospital and a tertiary referral center.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were 52 cases of cord prolapse in our patient population, for an incidence of 3.0/1,000, similar to that in the literature. Of viable singleton pregnancies with frank prolapse, the rate was 1.6/1,000. In this series we found an approximately 40% higher rate of frank cord prolapse in induced patients at the community hospital than in the general population. Other than 2 fetal deaths related to extreme prematurity, all mothers and infants did well.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe higher incidence of cord prolapse among women with induction of labor in this population merits further study. The lack of significant morbidity and mortality in the study suggests that modern obstetric practices may influenced the natural history of umbilical cord prolapse.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000182901.55517.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. STUDY DESIGN This study was a retrospective chart review at both a community hospital and a tertiary referral center. RESULTS There were 52 cases of cord prolapse in our patient population, for an incidence of 3.0/1,000, similar to that in the literature. Of viable singleton pregnancies with frank prolapse, the rate was 1.6/1,000. In this series we found an approximately 40% higher rate of frank cord prolapse in induced patients at the community hospital than in the general population. Other than 2 fetal deaths related to extreme prematurity, all mothers and infants did well. CONCLUSION The higher incidence of cord prolapse among women with induction of labor in this population merits further study. The lack of significant morbidity and mortality in the study suggests that modern obstetric practices may influenced the natural history of umbilical cord prolapse.
当前产科实践中的脐带脱垂。
目的探讨当前产科中脐带脱垂的发生率、危险因素及预后。研究设计:本研究是对一家社区医院和一家三级转诊中心的回顾性图表分析。结果本组患者中有52例脐带脱垂,发生率为3.0/ 1000,与文献相似。可存活的单胎妊娠伴明显脱垂的发生率为1.6/ 1000。在这一系列研究中,我们发现在社区医院接受诱导性脊髓脱垂的患者比在普通人群中高出约40%。除了2例与极端早产相关的胎儿死亡外,所有母亲和婴儿都很好。结论该人群引产妇女脐带脱垂发生率较高,值得进一步研究。该研究中缺乏显著的发病率和死亡率,表明现代产科实践可能影响脐带脱垂的自然史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信