FREQUENCIES AND FUNCTIONS OF REPORTING VERBS USED IN TESOL RESEARCH ARTICLES BY VIETNAMESE WRITERS

Bui Thi Kim Loan
{"title":"FREQUENCIES AND FUNCTIONS OF REPORTING VERBS USED IN TESOL RESEARCH ARTICLES BY VIETNAMESE WRITERS","authors":"Bui Thi Kim Loan","doi":"10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to ensure proper reporting verbs (RVs) to be used in academic writing remains a difficulty to Vietnamese research writers. Nguyen and Pramoolsook’s (2015) study findings reveal that Vietnamese TESOL students inappropriately use RVs in their master’s theses in terms of function, voice and tenses. This corpus-based study aimed to investigate the frequencies and functions of RVs in TESOL research articles written by Vietnamese writers based on RMIT University Study and Learning Center’s (2012) categorization of RVs in terms of position or evaluation. The corpus consisted of 35 TESOL research articles collected from a PDF book of TESOL international conference proceedings. The data were processed using Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel. The findings revealed that TESOL research Vietnamese writers had a tendency to use groups of RVs with neutral position or evaluation. The results of the functional analysis of RVS indicated eleven functions of RVs including agreement, argument/persuasion, believing, conclusion, disagreement/questioning, discussion, emphasis, evaluation/examination, explanation, presentation, and discussion. The results provide TESOL research Vietnamese writers, research scholars as well as students from all disciplines at higher education with more knowledge of RVs that they can use for their future academic writing and international publishing. \n ","PeriodicalId":249991,"journal":{"name":"VNU Journal of Foreign Studies","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VNU Journal of Foreign Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How to ensure proper reporting verbs (RVs) to be used in academic writing remains a difficulty to Vietnamese research writers. Nguyen and Pramoolsook’s (2015) study findings reveal that Vietnamese TESOL students inappropriately use RVs in their master’s theses in terms of function, voice and tenses. This corpus-based study aimed to investigate the frequencies and functions of RVs in TESOL research articles written by Vietnamese writers based on RMIT University Study and Learning Center’s (2012) categorization of RVs in terms of position or evaluation. The corpus consisted of 35 TESOL research articles collected from a PDF book of TESOL international conference proceedings. The data were processed using Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel. The findings revealed that TESOL research Vietnamese writers had a tendency to use groups of RVs with neutral position or evaluation. The results of the functional analysis of RVS indicated eleven functions of RVs including agreement, argument/persuasion, believing, conclusion, disagreement/questioning, discussion, emphasis, evaluation/examination, explanation, presentation, and discussion. The results provide TESOL research Vietnamese writers, research scholars as well as students from all disciplines at higher education with more knowledge of RVs that they can use for their future academic writing and international publishing.  
越南语作者在tesol研究文章中所使用的间接动词的频率和功能
如何确保在学术写作中正确使用转述动词一直是越南研究型作者面临的一个难题。Nguyen和Pramoolsook(2015)的研究发现,越南TESOL学生在其硕士论文中在功能、语态和时态方面不恰当地使用房车。本研究以语料库为基础,以RMIT大学研究与学习中心(2012)对房车的位置或评价分类为基础,探讨房车在越南作家TESOL研究文章中的使用频率和功能。该语料库包括35篇TESOL研究论文,摘自一本PDF格式的TESOL国际会议论文集。使用Microsoft Word和Microsoft Excel对数据进行处理。研究结果显示,越南语TESOL研究作者倾向于使用立场中立或评价中立的rv组。RVS的功能分析结果表明,RVS具有同意、论证/说服、相信、结论、不同意/质疑、讨论、强调、评价/检查、解释、呈现和讨论等11种功能。研究结果为从事TESOL研究的越南作家、研究学者以及高等教育各学科的学生提供了更多关于房车的知识,供他们将来的学术写作和国际出版使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信