ABOUT CONCEPTUAL SCHEMES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC SCIENCE

C. V. Fenin
{"title":"ABOUT CONCEPTUAL SCHEMES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC SCIENCE","authors":"C. V. Fenin","doi":"10.20310/1819-8813-2020-15-2(109)-56-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We carried out a theoretical analysis of various concepts used to describe and explain the development, progress and evolution of economic theory (economic science). The study found that the dynamics and transformations of economic theory were described using models of the development of scientific knowledge of three prominent philosophers and thinkers, namely: K.R. Popper, T. Kuhn and I. Lakatos. Nevertheless, the merits of each of these conceptual schemes are balanced by shortcomings, following mainly from the fact that K.R. Popper, T. Kuhn and I. Lakatos's concepts were developed to analyze the development of natural science knowledge. In this regard, an attempt was made to describe and explain the development of economic science through the use of an earlier approach - the law of the intellectual evolution of humanity by A. Comte. This approach reveals its advantages, expressed in the simplicity of presentation, openness to further research and interpretation of new results in the field of research on the development of economic thought. At the same time, it is worth noting the existence of shortcomings of the author's approach, consisting in the difficulty of establishing a chronological framework for the development of economic theory, the impossibility of using the A. Comte's law to describe the evolution of all economic schools, the fuzziness of the boundaries (periods) of the development of economic knowledge and a simplified understanding of the development of science itself as non-discontinuous progress - improvement.","PeriodicalId":355661,"journal":{"name":"Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/1819-8813-2020-15-2(109)-56-62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We carried out a theoretical analysis of various concepts used to describe and explain the development, progress and evolution of economic theory (economic science). The study found that the dynamics and transformations of economic theory were described using models of the development of scientific knowledge of three prominent philosophers and thinkers, namely: K.R. Popper, T. Kuhn and I. Lakatos. Nevertheless, the merits of each of these conceptual schemes are balanced by shortcomings, following mainly from the fact that K.R. Popper, T. Kuhn and I. Lakatos's concepts were developed to analyze the development of natural science knowledge. In this regard, an attempt was made to describe and explain the development of economic science through the use of an earlier approach - the law of the intellectual evolution of humanity by A. Comte. This approach reveals its advantages, expressed in the simplicity of presentation, openness to further research and interpretation of new results in the field of research on the development of economic thought. At the same time, it is worth noting the existence of shortcomings of the author's approach, consisting in the difficulty of establishing a chronological framework for the development of economic theory, the impossibility of using the A. Comte's law to describe the evolution of all economic schools, the fuzziness of the boundaries (periods) of the development of economic knowledge and a simplified understanding of the development of science itself as non-discontinuous progress - improvement.
关于经济科学发展的概念方案
我们对用来描述和解释经济理论(经济科学)的发展、进步和演变的各种概念进行了理论分析。研究发现,经济理论的动态和转变是用三位著名哲学家和思想家的科学知识发展模型来描述的,他们是:K.R.波普尔、T.库恩和I.拉卡托斯。然而,这些概念方案的优点与缺点相平衡,主要是因为K.R.波普尔、T.库恩和I.拉卡托斯的概念是用来分析自然科学知识的发展的。在这方面,A.孔德试图通过使用一种较早的方法——人类智力进化规律——来描述和解释经济科学的发展。这种方法显示了它的优势,表现在陈述的简单性、对进一步研究的开放性以及对经济思想发展研究领域新成果的解释。与此同时,值得注意的是,作者的方法存在缺点,包括难以为经济理论的发展建立一个时间框架,不可能使用a .孔德定律来描述所有经济学派的演变,经济知识发展的边界(时期)的模糊性以及将科学发展本身理解为不连续的进步-改进的简化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信