Metrics for Evaluating Video Streaming Quality in Lossy IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks

An Chan, K. Zeng, P. Mohapatra, Sung-Ju Lee, S. Banerjee
{"title":"Metrics for Evaluating Video Streaming Quality in Lossy IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks","authors":"An Chan, K. Zeng, P. Mohapatra, Sung-Ju Lee, S. Banerjee","doi":"10.1109/INFCOM.2010.5461979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) is the simplest and the most widely used video quality evaluation methodology. However, traditional PSNR calculations do not take the packet loss into account. This shortcoming, which is amplified in wireless networks, contributes to the inaccuracy in evaluating video streaming quality in wireless communications. Such inaccuracy in PSNR calculations adversely affects the development of video communications in wireless networks. This paper proposes a novel video quality evaluation methodology. As it not only considers the PSNR of a video, but also with modifications to handle the packet loss issue, we name this evaluation method MPSNR. MPSNR rectifies the inaccuracies in traditional PSNR computation, and helps us to approximate subjective video quality, Mean Opinion Score (MOS), more accurately. Using PSNR values calculated from MPSNR and simple network measurements, we apply linear regression techniques to derive two specific objective video quality metrics, PSNR-based Objective MOS (POMOS) and Rates-based Objective MOS (ROMOS). Through extensive experiments and human subjective tests, we show that the two metrics demonstrate high correlation with MOS. POMOS takes the averaged PSNR value of a video calculated from MPSNR as the only input. Despite its simplicity, it has a Pearson correlation of 0.8664 with the MOS. By adding a few other simple network measurements, such as the proportion of distorted frames in a video, ROMOS achieves an even higher Pearson correlation (0.9350) with the MOS. Compared with the PSNR metric from the traditional PSNR calculations, our metrics evaluate video streaming quality in wireless networks with a much higher accuracy while retaining the simplicity of PSNR calculation.","PeriodicalId":259639,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2010.5461979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) is the simplest and the most widely used video quality evaluation methodology. However, traditional PSNR calculations do not take the packet loss into account. This shortcoming, which is amplified in wireless networks, contributes to the inaccuracy in evaluating video streaming quality in wireless communications. Such inaccuracy in PSNR calculations adversely affects the development of video communications in wireless networks. This paper proposes a novel video quality evaluation methodology. As it not only considers the PSNR of a video, but also with modifications to handle the packet loss issue, we name this evaluation method MPSNR. MPSNR rectifies the inaccuracies in traditional PSNR computation, and helps us to approximate subjective video quality, Mean Opinion Score (MOS), more accurately. Using PSNR values calculated from MPSNR and simple network measurements, we apply linear regression techniques to derive two specific objective video quality metrics, PSNR-based Objective MOS (POMOS) and Rates-based Objective MOS (ROMOS). Through extensive experiments and human subjective tests, we show that the two metrics demonstrate high correlation with MOS. POMOS takes the averaged PSNR value of a video calculated from MPSNR as the only input. Despite its simplicity, it has a Pearson correlation of 0.8664 with the MOS. By adding a few other simple network measurements, such as the proportion of distorted frames in a video, ROMOS achieves an even higher Pearson correlation (0.9350) with the MOS. Compared with the PSNR metric from the traditional PSNR calculations, our metrics evaluate video streaming quality in wireless networks with a much higher accuracy while retaining the simplicity of PSNR calculation.
有损IEEE 802.11无线网络中视频流质量评估指标
峰值信噪比(PSNR)是最简单、应用最广泛的视频质量评价方法。然而,传统的PSNR计算不考虑丢包。这一缺点在无线网络中被放大,导致了无线通信中视频流质量评估的不准确性。这种PSNR计算的不准确性影响了无线网络中视频通信的发展。本文提出了一种新的视频质量评价方法。由于它不仅考虑了视频的PSNR,而且还进行了修改以处理丢包问题,因此我们将这种评估方法命名为MPSNR。MPSNR修正了传统PSNR计算的不准确性,并帮助我们更准确地近似主观视频质量,即平均意见评分(Mean Opinion Score, MOS)。利用从MPSNR和简单网络测量中计算的PSNR值,我们应用线性回归技术推导出两个特定的客观视频质量指标,基于PSNR的目标MOS (POMOS)和基于率的目标MOS (ROMOS)。通过广泛的实验和人类主观测试,我们表明这两个指标与MOS高度相关。POMOS将由MPSNR计算出的视频平均PSNR值作为唯一输入。尽管它很简单,但它与MOS的Pearson相关性为0.8664。通过添加一些其他简单的网络测量,例如视频中扭曲帧的比例,ROMOS与MOS实现了更高的Pearson相关性(0.9350)。与传统PSNR计算的PSNR度量相比,我们的度量在保持PSNR计算的简单性的同时,以更高的精度评估无线网络中的视频流质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信