Analysis of Lack of Basis for Judge Considerations in Cases of Abortion by Teenagers

LM Ady Saputra
{"title":"Analysis of Lack of Basis for Judge Considerations in Cases of Abortion by Teenagers","authors":"LM Ady Saputra","doi":"10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this writing is to analyze what the judges consider about the crime of abortion (Decision Study Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto). The writing method used is Normative writing, using 2 approaches namely; law (statute approach) and a case approach (case approach). The results of this writing show; In decision Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto. Judges are not based on strong juridical considerations by applying the principle of lex specialist derogate legi general and the principle of lex posterior derogate legi priori,","PeriodicalId":309785,"journal":{"name":"Estudiante Law Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudiante Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is to analyze what the judges consider about the crime of abortion (Decision Study Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto). The writing method used is Normative writing, using 2 approaches namely; law (statute approach) and a case approach (case approach). The results of this writing show; In decision Number: 90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto. Judges are not based on strong juridical considerations by applying the principle of lex specialist derogate legi general and the principle of lex posterior derogate legi priori,
浅析青少年堕胎案件中法官考虑依据的缺乏
这篇文章的目的是分析法官对堕胎罪的看法(决策研究编号:90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto)。使用的写作方法是规范写作,使用两种方法,即;法律方法(成文法方法)和案例方法(案例方法)。本文的写作结果表明;决议号:90/Pid.Sus/2021/PN/Gto。法官没有基于强烈的司法考虑而适用专门法减损一般法律原则和事后法减损先验法律原则;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信