ANALISIS PERSEPSI STAKEHOLDER TERKAIT IMPLEMENTASI KAWASAN EKONOMI KHUSUS (KEK) VERSUS FREE TRADE ZONE (FTZ) DI KOTA BATAM

Rikson Pandapotan Tampubolon
{"title":"ANALISIS PERSEPSI STAKEHOLDER TERKAIT IMPLEMENTASI KAWASAN EKONOMI KHUSUS (KEK) VERSUS FREE TRADE ZONE (FTZ) DI KOTA BATAM","authors":"Rikson Pandapotan Tampubolon","doi":"10.33884/jimupb.v6i2.679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the free trade zone system that has been carried out with the planned implementation of special economic zones in Batam City. The economic downturn in the city of Batam has made stakeholders think again about the concept of free trade zone (ftz) or Free Port and Free Trade Zone. The FTZ concept is deemed no longer compatible with the current flow and competitiveness of change. For this reason, the central government offers the concept of special economic zones (KEK) to revive the passion of economic growth in this Industrial City. However, in the implementation there were many criticisms made by the community, especially businessmen who considered SEZ not to answer the problems that exist in Batam's economic growth. This study uses a qualitative approach to see each perception from stakeholders (stakeholders) to be a consideration in making decisions. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that it was important that all stakeholders would sit together to discuss the good about the economy. The government must prioritize a bottom-up approach to find solutions to problems regarding the polemic of the best economic system problems for Batam City.","PeriodicalId":326664,"journal":{"name":"JIM UPB (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Universitas Putera Batam)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIM UPB (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Universitas Putera Batam)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33884/jimupb.v6i2.679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the free trade zone system that has been carried out with the planned implementation of special economic zones in Batam City. The economic downturn in the city of Batam has made stakeholders think again about the concept of free trade zone (ftz) or Free Port and Free Trade Zone. The FTZ concept is deemed no longer compatible with the current flow and competitiveness of change. For this reason, the central government offers the concept of special economic zones (KEK) to revive the passion of economic growth in this Industrial City. However, in the implementation there were many criticisms made by the community, especially businessmen who considered SEZ not to answer the problems that exist in Batam's economic growth. This study uses a qualitative approach to see each perception from stakeholders (stakeholders) to be a consideration in making decisions. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that it was important that all stakeholders would sit together to discuss the good about the economy. The government must prioritize a bottom-up approach to find solutions to problems regarding the polemic of the best economic system problems for Batam City.
分析利益相关者对其在巴淡市实施的特别经济和自由贸易区的实施的看法
本研究旨在评估随着巴淡市经济特区计划的实施而实施的自由贸易区制度。巴淡岛的经济低迷让利益相关者重新思考自由贸易区(ftz)或自由港和自由贸易区的概念。自由贸易区的概念被认为已不再符合当前的变化趋势和竞争力。为此,中央政府提出了经济特区(KEK)的概念,以恢复这个工业城市的经济增长热情。然而,在实施过程中,社会各界提出了许多批评,特别是商人认为经济特区不能解决巴淡岛经济增长中存在的问题。本研究使用定性方法来观察利益相关者(利益相关者)的每个感知,以作为决策的考虑因素。根据分析结果,人们发现,所有利益相关者坐下来讨论经济的好处是很重要的。对于巴淡市的最佳经济体制问题争论,政府应该优先考虑自下而上的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信