Reviews of collections of folklore songs on the pages of the critical-bibliographical magazine "Knyhar"

Alona Khailo
{"title":"Reviews of collections of folklore songs on the pages of the critical-bibliographical magazine \"Knyhar\"","authors":"Alona Khailo","doi":"10.36273/2076-9555.2021.8(301).30-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author conducts a complex study of reviews from the columns of the magazine \"Knyhar\" which dedicated to published collections of folk songs (included both author's poetry and folk texts) and a separate editions of folk songs. In particular, the study includes the following issues of the \"Knyhar\": 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12—13, 16, 20, 21. Previous studies are briefly analyzed, namely a number of works which had been found during the work on the article and cover broader topics such as history, historiography, bibliography, bibliography, literary studies and publishing. Theoretical analysis of the review as a genre is carried out and the reviews of the \"Knyhar\" in general are made. The author examines the actual texts of reviews on the topic and carried out their analytical review. In addition, the names and personalities, the scope of activities of reviewers were identified. The names and field of activity of reviewers who participated in the critical review and evaluation of collections of song folklore (specialists in the field of musicology, folklore, literature and pedagogy) were identified. Approaches to the evaluation of a peer-reviewed work are clarified, as they depend on the direction of the publication itself, as well as on the field of interest of the reviewer. The approaches of scientists to the critical evaluation of publications are analyzed and systematized. The researcher also investigates which aspects of printed works were of interest to the authors of the reviews.","PeriodicalId":211054,"journal":{"name":"Вісник Книжкової палати","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вісник Книжкової палати","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36273/2076-9555.2021.8(301).30-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author conducts a complex study of reviews from the columns of the magazine "Knyhar" which dedicated to published collections of folk songs (included both author's poetry and folk texts) and a separate editions of folk songs. In particular, the study includes the following issues of the "Knyhar": 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12—13, 16, 20, 21. Previous studies are briefly analyzed, namely a number of works which had been found during the work on the article and cover broader topics such as history, historiography, bibliography, bibliography, literary studies and publishing. Theoretical analysis of the review as a genre is carried out and the reviews of the "Knyhar" in general are made. The author examines the actual texts of reviews on the topic and carried out their analytical review. In addition, the names and personalities, the scope of activities of reviewers were identified. The names and field of activity of reviewers who participated in the critical review and evaluation of collections of song folklore (specialists in the field of musicology, folklore, literature and pedagogy) were identified. Approaches to the evaluation of a peer-reviewed work are clarified, as they depend on the direction of the publication itself, as well as on the field of interest of the reviewer. The approaches of scientists to the critical evaluation of publications are analyzed and systematized. The researcher also investigates which aspects of printed works were of interest to the authors of the reviews.
批评书目杂志《Knyhar》对民间歌曲集的评论
作者对《Knyhar》杂志专栏的评论进行了复杂的研究,该杂志致力于出版民歌集(包括作者的诗歌和民间文本)和民歌的单独版本。具体而言,本研究包括《Knyhar》的以下几期:1、3、4、6、8、12-13、16、20、21。本文简要分析了前人的研究成果,即在本文的研究过程中发现的一些著作,涵盖了历史学、史学、目录学、目录学、文学研究和出版等更广泛的主题。本文从理论的角度对《克尼哈尔》作为一个体裁进行了分析,并从总体上对《克尼哈尔》进行了评价。作者考察了有关该主题的评论的实际文本,并进行了分析性评论。此外,还确定了审稿人的姓名和个性、活动范围。确定了参与歌曲民俗学文集批判性审查和评价的审稿人(音乐学、民俗学、文学和教育学领域的专家)的姓名和活动领域。评估同行评议作品的方法是明确的,因为它们取决于出版物本身的方向,以及审稿人感兴趣的领域。科学家对出版物进行批判性评估的方法进行了分析和系统化。研究人员还调查了评论作者对印刷作品的哪些方面感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信