PAFAS at work: comparing the worst-case efficiency of three buffer implementations

F. Corradini, Maria Rita Di Berardini, W. Vogler
{"title":"PAFAS at work: comparing the worst-case efficiency of three buffer implementations","authors":"F. Corradini, Maria Rita Di Berardini, W. Vogler","doi":"10.1109/APAQS.2001.990024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors use PAFAS (Process Algebra for Faster Asynchronous Systems) to compare the worst-case efficiency of three bounded-buffer implementations: Fifo, Pipe and Buff. Fifo implements the buffer as a first-in-first-out queue, Pipe implements the buffer as a pipeline queue and Buff implements the buffer as circular queue in an array. We contrast our results with those by S. Arun-Kumar and M. Hennessy (1992) and l. Jenner and W. Vogler (1996) which also aim at comparing the three implementations of the bounded buffer according to some efficiency measure.","PeriodicalId":145151,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APAQS.2001.990024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The authors use PAFAS (Process Algebra for Faster Asynchronous Systems) to compare the worst-case efficiency of three bounded-buffer implementations: Fifo, Pipe and Buff. Fifo implements the buffer as a first-in-first-out queue, Pipe implements the buffer as a pipeline queue and Buff implements the buffer as circular queue in an array. We contrast our results with those by S. Arun-Kumar and M. Hennessy (1992) and l. Jenner and W. Vogler (1996) which also aim at comparing the three implementations of the bounded buffer according to some efficiency measure.
工作中的PAFAS:比较三种缓冲区实现的最坏情况效率
作者使用PAFAS(更快异步系统的进程代数)来比较三种有界缓冲实现的最坏情况效率:Fifo, Pipe和Buff。Fifo将缓冲区实现为先进先出队列,Pipe将缓冲区实现为管道队列,而Buff将缓冲区实现为数组中的循环队列。我们将我们的结果与S. Arun-Kumar和M. Hennessy(1992)以及l. Jenner和W. Vogler(1996)的结果进行了对比,后者也旨在根据某些效率措施比较有界缓冲的三种实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信