Information Relaxations and Duality in Stochastic Dynamic Programs

David B. Brown, James E. Smith, Peng Sun
{"title":"Information Relaxations and Duality in Stochastic Dynamic Programs","authors":"David B. Brown, James E. Smith, Peng Sun","doi":"10.1287/opre.1090.0796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe a general technique for determining upper bounds on maximal values (or lower bounds on minimal costs) in stochastic dynamic programs. In this approach, we relax the nonanticipativity constraints that require decisions to depend only on the information available at the time a decision is made and impose a “penalty” that punishes violations of nonanticipativity. In applications, the hope is that this relaxed version of the problem will be simpler to solve than the original dynamic program. The upper bounds provided by this dual approach complement lower bounds on values that may be found by simulating with heuristic policies. We describe the theory underlying this dual approach and establish weak duality, strong duality, and complementary slackness results that are analogous to the duality results of linear programming. We also study properties of good penalties. Finally, we demonstrate the use of this dual approach in an adaptive inventory control problem with an unknown and changing demand distribution and in valuing options with stochastic volatilities and interest rates. These are complex problems of significant practical interest that are quite difficult to solve to optimality. In these examples, our dual approach requires relatively little additional computation and leads to tight bounds on the optimal values.","PeriodicalId":329329,"journal":{"name":"Found. Trends Optim.","volume":"1037 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"229","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Found. Trends Optim.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 229

Abstract

We describe a general technique for determining upper bounds on maximal values (or lower bounds on minimal costs) in stochastic dynamic programs. In this approach, we relax the nonanticipativity constraints that require decisions to depend only on the information available at the time a decision is made and impose a “penalty” that punishes violations of nonanticipativity. In applications, the hope is that this relaxed version of the problem will be simpler to solve than the original dynamic program. The upper bounds provided by this dual approach complement lower bounds on values that may be found by simulating with heuristic policies. We describe the theory underlying this dual approach and establish weak duality, strong duality, and complementary slackness results that are analogous to the duality results of linear programming. We also study properties of good penalties. Finally, we demonstrate the use of this dual approach in an adaptive inventory control problem with an unknown and changing demand distribution and in valuing options with stochastic volatilities and interest rates. These are complex problems of significant practical interest that are quite difficult to solve to optimality. In these examples, our dual approach requires relatively little additional computation and leads to tight bounds on the optimal values.
随机动态规划中的信息松弛和对偶性
我们描述了一种确定随机动态规划中最大值上界(或最小代价下界)的一般技术。在这种方法中,我们放松了非预见性约束,这些约束要求决策只依赖于决策时可用的信息,并施加“惩罚”来惩罚违反非预见性的行为。在应用程序中,希望这个问题的放松版本将比原来的动态程序更容易解决。这种对偶方法提供的上界补充了可能通过启发式策略模拟找到的值的下界。我们描述了这种对偶方法的理论基础,并建立了类似于线性规划对偶结果的弱对偶、强对偶和互补松弛结果。我们还研究了良好惩罚的性质。最后,我们展示了这种双重方法在具有未知和不断变化的需求分布的自适应库存控制问题以及具有随机波动率和利率的期权估值问题中的应用。这些都是具有重大实际意义的复杂问题,很难达到最优解。在这些示例中,我们的对偶方法需要相对较少的额外计算,并导致最优值的严格界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信