CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEBATE ON THE QUOAD USUM AGREEMENT

Jacek Zrałek
{"title":"CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEBATE ON THE QUOAD USUM AGREEMENT","authors":"Jacek Zrałek","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to propose a general and unified concept of the most optimal approach to the quoad usum agreement. In view of the significant discrepancies regarding the evaluation of the quoad usum contract both in the literature and in the jurisprudence, the weaknesses and inconsistencies of proposals incompatible with the suggested model have also been demonstrated. In the concept presented, consistent answers were proposed to the questions of the content of the concluded agreement, its nature (obligatory or in rem) and its characteristics (an act of management or an act modifying the content of the co-owners rights). The settlement of these issues made it possible to answer questions concerning the stability of the legal relationship created by the agreement, the transferability of rights and obligations from the agreement to the acquirer of the share (in inter vivos transactions and in connection with the death of a co-owner) and the possibility of termination or modification of the content of the quoad usum agreement.","PeriodicalId":158454,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims to propose a general and unified concept of the most optimal approach to the quoad usum agreement. In view of the significant discrepancies regarding the evaluation of the quoad usum contract both in the literature and in the jurisprudence, the weaknesses and inconsistencies of proposals incompatible with the suggested model have also been demonstrated. In the concept presented, consistent answers were proposed to the questions of the content of the concluded agreement, its nature (obligatory or in rem) and its characteristics (an act of management or an act modifying the content of the co-owners rights). The settlement of these issues made it possible to answer questions concerning the stability of the legal relationship created by the agreement, the transferability of rights and obligations from the agreement to the acquirer of the share (in inter vivos transactions and in connection with the death of a co-owner) and the possibility of termination or modification of the content of the quoad usum agreement.
对“共同份额协定”辩论的贡献
本文旨在提出一种通用的、统一的最优方法的概念。鉴于在文献和法理学中对既成物合同的评价存在重大差异,与所建议的模式不相容的建议的弱点和不一致之处也已得到证明。在提出的概念中,对所缔结协议的内容、性质(强制性或对物性)及其特征(管理行为或修改共有人权利内容的行为)等问题提出了一致的答案。这些问题的解决使我们能够回答以下问题:协议所建立的法律关系的稳定性、协议所规定的权利和义务向股份收购人的可转移性(在生前交易中以及在共同所有人死亡的情况下)以及终止或修改“一般”协议内容的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信