Economic Burden and Cost-Effectiveness of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Treatment in Asian Region: A Systematic Review

Nurul Alia Risma Rismayuddin, Nor Azmaniza Azizam, A. Ismail
{"title":"Economic Burden and Cost-Effectiveness of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Treatment in Asian Region: A Systematic Review","authors":"Nurul Alia Risma Rismayuddin, Nor Azmaniza Azizam, A. Ismail","doi":"10.24191/abrij.v7i1.13090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psoriasis poses a significant economic burden. A systematic review of psoriasis treatments cost and effectiveness has been performed extensively in the United States (US) and Europe, but such review is limited in Asia. This review aims to analyze all previous literature on the cost and effectiveness of systemic and biological treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. Cost of illness and cost-effectiveness studies that examined the economic burden, cost, and effectiveness of psoriasis treatments (systemic and biological) in Asian region from 2010 to 2020 were published in English language. All costs were converted into 2020 US Dollar. All COIs included found that direct medical costs were greater than indirect costs. Adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, secukinumab 150 mg were cost-effective treatments and of the lowest cost per PASI-75/PASI1 and/or QALY. When comparing the different treatments, topical and systemic psoriasis treatments were observed to be the most cost-effective compared with other modalities. Given the tremendous economic effects of psoriasis on patients and hospitals, economic analysis, clinicians, and policymakers should consider cost and effectiveness evidence, as this systematic literature review was conducted to analyze previous documentation regarding the cost and effectiveness of systemics and biologics in Asian countries.","PeriodicalId":398893,"journal":{"name":"ADVANCES IN BUSINESS RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ADVANCES IN BUSINESS RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/abrij.v7i1.13090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psoriasis poses a significant economic burden. A systematic review of psoriasis treatments cost and effectiveness has been performed extensively in the United States (US) and Europe, but such review is limited in Asia. This review aims to analyze all previous literature on the cost and effectiveness of systemic and biological treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. Cost of illness and cost-effectiveness studies that examined the economic burden, cost, and effectiveness of psoriasis treatments (systemic and biological) in Asian region from 2010 to 2020 were published in English language. All costs were converted into 2020 US Dollar. All COIs included found that direct medical costs were greater than indirect costs. Adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, secukinumab 150 mg were cost-effective treatments and of the lowest cost per PASI-75/PASI1 and/or QALY. When comparing the different treatments, topical and systemic psoriasis treatments were observed to be the most cost-effective compared with other modalities. Given the tremendous economic effects of psoriasis on patients and hospitals, economic analysis, clinicians, and policymakers should consider cost and effectiveness evidence, as this systematic literature review was conducted to analyze previous documentation regarding the cost and effectiveness of systemics and biologics in Asian countries.
亚洲地区中重度牛皮癣治疗的经济负担和成本效益:一项系统综述
牛皮癣造成了严重的经济负担。在美国和欧洲,对银屑病治疗的成本和效果进行了广泛的系统评价,但在亚洲,这种评价有限。本综述旨在分析所有关于中重度牛皮癣的系统和生物治疗的成本和效果的文献。2010年至2020年亚洲地区银屑病(全身和生物)治疗的经济负担、成本和效果的疾病成本和成本效益研究以英文发表。所有费用均折算为2020年美元。所包括的所有调查结果发现,直接医疗费用大于间接费用。阿达木单抗、ustekinumab、risankizumab、secukinumab 150mg是具有成本效益的治疗方法,并且每PASI-75/ pasi和/或QALY的成本最低。当比较不同的治疗方法时,局部和全身治疗银屑病被观察到与其他方式相比最具成本效益。鉴于牛皮癣对患者和医院的巨大经济影响,经济分析、临床医生和政策制定者应该考虑成本和有效性证据,因为本系统文献综述是为了分析亚洲国家关于系统制剂和生物制剂的成本和有效性的先前文献而进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信