Zeugung auf Probe? – Selektion vor der Schwangerschaft?

U. Eibach
{"title":"Zeugung auf Probe? – Selektion vor der Schwangerschaft?","authors":"U. Eibach","doi":"10.30965/29498570-04602005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Various moral considerations with respect to PGD, i. e. normative ones as well as those about the predictable and possible consequences, clearly converge to provide a persuasive argument against any form of legalising PGD. In particular, what counts against PGD are the affirmation of clearly negative judgments about the quality of life and the selection of embryos according to those judgments; the questioning of the human dignity and human rights of early human embryos; and the resultant qualification of the prohibition to kill. This puts us on a slippery slope and undermines more and more the protection of life for the weakest members of our society. Thus there cannot be a right to a »healthy child« by way of PG D. From a Christian-moral perspective, the government and parliament would be well advised not to leave the regulation of the use of PGD to the professional medical organisations but to outlaw PGD in the planned Reproductive Medicine Act.","PeriodicalId":288000,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/29498570-04602005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various moral considerations with respect to PGD, i. e. normative ones as well as those about the predictable and possible consequences, clearly converge to provide a persuasive argument against any form of legalising PGD. In particular, what counts against PGD are the affirmation of clearly negative judgments about the quality of life and the selection of embryos according to those judgments; the questioning of the human dignity and human rights of early human embryos; and the resultant qualification of the prohibition to kill. This puts us on a slippery slope and undermines more and more the protection of life for the weakest members of our society. Thus there cannot be a right to a »healthy child« by way of PG D. From a Christian-moral perspective, the government and parliament would be well advised not to leave the regulation of the use of PGD to the professional medical organisations but to outlaw PGD in the planned Reproductive Medicine Act.
受孕?怀孕前的筛选?
关于PGD的各种道德考虑,即规范性的考虑以及关于可预测和可能的后果的考虑,显然汇集在一起,提供了一个有说服力的论据,反对任何形式的PGD合法化。特别是,反对PGD的是对生命质量和根据这些判断选择胚胎的明显负面判断的肯定;对人类早期胚胎的尊严和人权的质疑;以及由此产生的禁止杀人的资格。这使我们陷入滑坡,并越来越破坏对我们社会中最弱势成员的生命保护。因此,不可能有通过生殖受精获得"健康儿童"的权利。从基督教道德的角度来看,最好建议政府和议会不要把对生殖受精使用的监管交给专业医疗组织,而应在计划中的《生殖医学法》中宣布生殖受精为非法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信