Multi-issue coalitions in the Congress (voting alignments on supercomputer)

J. Stampen, J. R. Davis
{"title":"Multi-issue coalitions in the Congress (voting alignments on supercomputer)","authors":"J. Stampen, J. R. Davis","doi":"10.1109/SUPERC.1988.74142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors explore voting alignments in six US Senates between 1959 and 1981. The authors' thesis is that the Senate is organized by four recurring multiissue coalitions that combine in various ways to form larger voting coalitions. The four-coalition hypothesis was tested with the use of complete-link hierarchical clustering on a matrix of senators over contested bills. The significance of clustering into four rather than some other number of groups was established by computing gamma goodness-of-fit statistics for each possible clustering, a computation that was practical only with the aid of a supercomputer. Beyond the basic clustering result, descriptive statistics were used to measure membership consistency over time. Membership in the four coalitions persisted even across Senates spanning the supposed Reagan realignment. This finding and others support the conclusion that the multiissue coalition is the appropriate unit in roll-call analysis.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":103561,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Supercomputing Vol.II: Science and Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Supercomputing Vol.II: Science and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SUPERC.1988.74142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors explore voting alignments in six US Senates between 1959 and 1981. The authors' thesis is that the Senate is organized by four recurring multiissue coalitions that combine in various ways to form larger voting coalitions. The four-coalition hypothesis was tested with the use of complete-link hierarchical clustering on a matrix of senators over contested bills. The significance of clustering into four rather than some other number of groups was established by computing gamma goodness-of-fit statistics for each possible clustering, a computation that was practical only with the aid of a supercomputer. Beyond the basic clustering result, descriptive statistics were used to measure membership consistency over time. Membership in the four coalitions persisted even across Senates spanning the supposed Reagan realignment. This finding and others support the conclusion that the multiissue coalition is the appropriate unit in roll-call analysis.<>
国会中的多议题联盟(超级计算机上的投票联盟)
作者探讨了1959年至1981年间美国六个参议院的投票联盟。作者的论点是,参议院是由四个反复出现的多议题联盟组成的,这些联盟以各种方式组合起来,形成更大的投票联盟。四个联盟的假设是通过使用完全链接分层聚类对参议员的矩阵在有争议的法案进行测试。通过计算每个可能的聚类的伽马拟合优度统计来确定聚类为四组而不是其他数量的组的重要性,这种计算只有在超级计算机的帮助下才能实现。除了基本的聚类结果之外,还使用描述性统计来衡量成员关系随时间的一致性。这四个联盟的成员甚至在所谓的里根重组时期的参议院也一直存在。这一发现和其他发现支持了一个结论,即多议题联盟是唱名分析的合适单位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信