Shadowing and Mobility Effect on Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocol in MANET

Istikmal Istikmal, S. Hadiyoso, I. D. Irawati, A. Irawan
{"title":"Shadowing and Mobility Effect on Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocol in MANET","authors":"Istikmal Istikmal, S. Hadiyoso, I. D. Irawati, A. Irawan","doi":"10.26760/elkomika.v9i4.966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compared the proactive routing protocols Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and the reactive routing protocols Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) in shadowing propagation and mobility model on mobile adhoc network (MANET). There are two test scenarios, such as the impact of user movement velocity and variations in user pause time with Random Way Point (RWP) mobility. In user velocity testing, the greater the speed, the throughput performance will decrease, while the delay and Normalized Routing Load (NRL) will increase. The pause time test describes the dynamics of changing network topology. The longer the pause time, the longer the topology changes, as a result, the throughput parameter increases while the end-to-end delay and NRL decrease. The proactive OLSR shows the best performance compared to other protocols based on throughput parameters, while the reactive AODV outperforms for end-to-end delay and NRL parameters.","PeriodicalId":344430,"journal":{"name":"ELKOMIKA: Jurnal Teknik Energi Elektrik, Teknik Telekomunikasi, & Teknik Elektronika","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELKOMIKA: Jurnal Teknik Energi Elektrik, Teknik Telekomunikasi, & Teknik Elektronika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26760/elkomika.v9i4.966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we compared the proactive routing protocols Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and the reactive routing protocols Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) in shadowing propagation and mobility model on mobile adhoc network (MANET). There are two test scenarios, such as the impact of user movement velocity and variations in user pause time with Random Way Point (RWP) mobility. In user velocity testing, the greater the speed, the throughput performance will decrease, while the delay and Normalized Routing Load (NRL) will increase. The pause time test describes the dynamics of changing network topology. The longer the pause time, the longer the topology changes, as a result, the throughput parameter increases while the end-to-end delay and NRL decrease. The proactive OLSR shows the best performance compared to other protocols based on throughput parameters, while the reactive AODV outperforms for end-to-end delay and NRL parameters.
MANET中主动和被动路由协议的阴影和移动性影响
本文比较了主动路由协议优化链路状态路由(OLSR)和被动路由协议Ad-hoc按需距离矢量路由(AODV)和动态源路由(DSR)在移动自组网(MANET)上的阴影传播和移动模型。有两个测试场景,例如用户移动速度的影响和用户暂停时间随随机路径点(RWP)移动性的变化。在用户速度测试中,速度越大,吞吐量性能越低,而延迟和归一化路由负载(NRL)会增加。暂停时间测试描述了网络拓扑变化的动态。暂停时间越长,拓扑变化越长,因此吞吐量参数增加,端到端延迟和NRL减少。与其他协议相比,基于吞吐量参数的主动OLSR表现出最佳性能,而响应式AODV在端到端延迟和NRL参数方面表现优于其他协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信