Prediction by means hazard rate occurrence is a deeply wrong approach

Anna Paggi, G. Mariotti, Roberto Paggi, Andrea Calogero, F. Leccese
{"title":"Prediction by means hazard rate occurrence is a deeply wrong approach","authors":"Anna Paggi, G. Mariotti, Roberto Paggi, Andrea Calogero, F. Leccese","doi":"10.1109/METROAEROSPACE.2017.7999580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a strong critic to the classical procedure used for the prediction of failure occurrences for mechanical and electronic equipment. The present procedure is based on the concept of randomness that has the undoubted vantage of the easiness, moreover, it is traditionally used so it is well known by scientists, technicians and experts in the field, but it a priori renounces to the knowledge of the causes that lead to failure. The paper presents a new approach to face the problematic showing that it is possible to follow new and more accurate routes and presents a typical application.","PeriodicalId":229414,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METROAEROSPACE.2017.7999580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper is a strong critic to the classical procedure used for the prediction of failure occurrences for mechanical and electronic equipment. The present procedure is based on the concept of randomness that has the undoubted vantage of the easiness, moreover, it is traditionally used so it is well known by scientists, technicians and experts in the field, but it a priori renounces to the knowledge of the causes that lead to failure. The paper presents a new approach to face the problematic showing that it is possible to follow new and more accurate routes and presents a typical application.
通过灾害发生率来预测是一个非常错误的方法
本文对用于机械和电子设备故障发生预测的经典程序提出了强烈的批评。目前的程序是基于随机性的概念,它无疑具有简单的优势,此外,它被传统地使用,因此它被该领域的科学家,技术人员和专家所熟知,但它先验地放弃了导致失败的原因的知识。本文提出了一种新的方法来解决这一问题,表明可以遵循新的和更精确的路线,并给出了一个典型的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信