Considerations regarding deception detection in investigative activities

Alin Dreptate
{"title":"Considerations regarding deception detection in investigative activities","authors":"Alin Dreptate","doi":"10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of deception in investigative activities represents a process taking place in the domains of verbal, written and nonverbal communication through the presence of indicators that necessitates both fusion and conjugated interpretation. These indicators are not proof of deception; however, they mark the existence of inadvertencies that require further exploration. Additionally, bio-psychological and social traits of persons engaged in the investigation, and cultural factors, all corroborated with the limits of analytical techniques, contribute to underlining the complexity of the investigation. The acknowledgement of these limitations allows one to diminish subjectivity, but not to fully eradicate it.","PeriodicalId":298214,"journal":{"name":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of deception in investigative activities represents a process taking place in the domains of verbal, written and nonverbal communication through the presence of indicators that necessitates both fusion and conjugated interpretation. These indicators are not proof of deception; however, they mark the existence of inadvertencies that require further exploration. Additionally, bio-psychological and social traits of persons engaged in the investigation, and cultural factors, all corroborated with the limits of analytical techniques, contribute to underlining the complexity of the investigation. The acknowledgement of these limitations allows one to diminish subjectivity, but not to fully eradicate it.
调查活动中关于欺骗侦查的考虑
对调查活动中的欺骗行为的分析是一个发生在口头、书面和非口头交流领域的过程,通过存在需要融合和共轭解释的指标。这些指标并不是欺骗的证据;然而,它们标志着疏忽的存在,需要进一步探索。此外,参与调查人员的生物心理和社会特征以及文化因素都与分析技术的局限性相印证,从而突出了调查的复杂性。承认这些限制可以减少主观性,但不能完全根除它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信