A reflection on the importance of standardised Dementia guidelines for intellectual disabilities: A clinical audit

Francesca Reyers, Deva D’Cruz
{"title":"A reflection on the importance of standardised Dementia guidelines for intellectual disabilities: A clinical audit","authors":"Francesca Reyers, Deva D’Cruz","doi":"10.53841/bpsfpid.2023.21.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the outcomes of an audit of a Community Learning Disabilities Team (CLDT) dementia pathway in the North East. The audit results were reflected on by two assistant psychologists under the supervision of a principal clinical psychologist. 80 out of 128 recommendations of the NG97 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines were deemed as not relevant to the CLDT. 45 relevant recommendations were met, three recommendations were deemed as both partially relevant and partially met. It was concluded that these findings highlight a need for intellectual disability-specific recommendations for more standardised dementia pathways within CLDTs.■As individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are more likely to be diagnosed with dementia than the general population, it is important to undertake regular audits to ensure that services are delivering the best care in-line with clinical standards.■An audit of the NICE guidelines for Dementia was completed through team meetings of different professionals who work on a CLDT dementia pathway.■Out of 128 recommendations, 80 recommendations were not relevant to the CLDT, 45 recommendations were relevant, and three were partially relevant.■All the relevant recommendations were being met■It was concluded that there is a need for ID-specific guidelines to standardise dementia pathways within CLDTs.","PeriodicalId":302131,"journal":{"name":"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2023.21.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the outcomes of an audit of a Community Learning Disabilities Team (CLDT) dementia pathway in the North East. The audit results were reflected on by two assistant psychologists under the supervision of a principal clinical psychologist. 80 out of 128 recommendations of the NG97 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines were deemed as not relevant to the CLDT. 45 relevant recommendations were met, three recommendations were deemed as both partially relevant and partially met. It was concluded that these findings highlight a need for intellectual disability-specific recommendations for more standardised dementia pathways within CLDTs.■As individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are more likely to be diagnosed with dementia than the general population, it is important to undertake regular audits to ensure that services are delivering the best care in-line with clinical standards.■An audit of the NICE guidelines for Dementia was completed through team meetings of different professionals who work on a CLDT dementia pathway.■Out of 128 recommendations, 80 recommendations were not relevant to the CLDT, 45 recommendations were relevant, and three were partially relevant.■All the relevant recommendations were being met■It was concluded that there is a need for ID-specific guidelines to standardise dementia pathways within CLDTs.
对智力残疾的标准化痴呆指南的重要性的反思:临床审计
本文讨论了东北地区社区学习障碍小组(CLDT)痴呆途径审计的结果。两名助理心理学家在一名首席临床心理学家的监督下对审计结果进行了反思。国家健康和护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南的128项建议中,有80项被认为与CLDT无关。45项相关建议得到满足,其中三项建议被认为部分相关和部分满足。结论是,这些发现强调需要针对cldt中更标准化的痴呆途径提出针对智力残疾的建议。■由于智障人士比一般人群更容易被诊断为痴呆症,因此定期进行审计以确保服务提供符合临床标准的最佳护理是很重要的。■通过CLDT痴呆途径的不同专业人员的团队会议,完成了NICE痴呆指南的审核。■在128项建议中,80项建议与CLDT无关,45项建议相关,3项建议部分相关。■所有相关建议都得到了满足■结论是,有必要制定针对id的指南,以标准化CLDTs中的痴呆途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信