Comparison of techniques for combination of evidence in a signal detection task

J. Boston
{"title":"Comparison of techniques for combination of evidence in a signal detection task","authors":"J. Boston","doi":"10.1109/DMESP.1991.171706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Signal decision models based on Dempster-Shafer and fuzzy set theories were developed to facilitate the implementation of a rule-based interpretation system for sensory evoked potential waveforms. The models do not require a priori probabilities, and they provide measures of uncertainty. The two models were applied to a set of brainstem auditory evoked potential waveforms. Both had lower absolute error rates than discriminant analysis, although they yielded large numbers of uncertain waveforms. The fuzzy set approach may be less sensitive to the exact form of the membership functions.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":117336,"journal":{"name":"[1991] Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Developing and Managing Expert System Programs","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991] Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Developing and Managing Expert System Programs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DMESP.1991.171706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Signal decision models based on Dempster-Shafer and fuzzy set theories were developed to facilitate the implementation of a rule-based interpretation system for sensory evoked potential waveforms. The models do not require a priori probabilities, and they provide measures of uncertainty. The two models were applied to a set of brainstem auditory evoked potential waveforms. Both had lower absolute error rates than discriminant analysis, although they yielded large numbers of uncertain waveforms. The fuzzy set approach may be less sensitive to the exact form of the membership functions.<>
信号检测任务中证据组合技术的比较
建立了基于Dempster-Shafer和模糊集理论的信号决策模型,以促进基于规则的感觉诱发电位波形解释系统的实现。这些模型不需要先验概率,它们提供了不确定性的度量。将这两种模型应用于一组脑干听觉诱发电位波形。两者的绝对错误率都低于判别分析,尽管它们产生了大量不确定的波形。模糊集方法可能对隶属函数的确切形式不太敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信