Assessment of Comirnaty Injections of Pregnant Women in the Manufacturer’s Risk Management Plan and by the European Medicines Agency: Mandatory Injections for Caregivers in France

Jérôme Sainton
{"title":"Assessment of Comirnaty Injections of Pregnant Women in the Manufacturer’s Risk Management Plan and by the European Medicines Agency: Mandatory Injections for Caregivers in France","authors":"Jérôme Sainton","doi":"10.56098/ijvtpr.v3i1.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this note is to analyse the safety assessment of Comirnaty vaccination of pregnant women in the manufacturer’s risk management plan (RMP) and in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) fact sheet, and to measure the impact on the recommendations that led to the mandatory vaccination of pregnant women caregivers and health-related professionals in France.\nThe evaluation of this safety was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, which ran from late 2020 to early 2022, the safety profile of the vaccine was not known in pregnant women. In the second phase, which ran from early 2022, the RMP and the EMA report data that were considered reassuring for short-term safety, but were limited. Long-term safety remains still unknown. The RMP is cautious and suggests that intentional injection of pregnant women will remain limited.\nThe detailed analysis of risk management by the manufacturer, the EMA and the French authorities reveals, to varying degrees, a lack of rigor. The EMA has disregarded certain elements of prudence maintained by the manufacturer, while the manufacturer has allowed the only real clinical trial that might determine any benefit-risk balance to lapse. What is more the only study was restricted to the third trimester of pregnancy. The French authorities recommended mandatory injection of pregnant women caregivers and health-related professionals at a time when the manufacturer and the EMA could provide no guarantees.","PeriodicalId":391540,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v3i1.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this note is to analyse the safety assessment of Comirnaty vaccination of pregnant women in the manufacturer’s risk management plan (RMP) and in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) fact sheet, and to measure the impact on the recommendations that led to the mandatory vaccination of pregnant women caregivers and health-related professionals in France. The evaluation of this safety was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, which ran from late 2020 to early 2022, the safety profile of the vaccine was not known in pregnant women. In the second phase, which ran from early 2022, the RMP and the EMA report data that were considered reassuring for short-term safety, but were limited. Long-term safety remains still unknown. The RMP is cautious and suggests that intentional injection of pregnant women will remain limited. The detailed analysis of risk management by the manufacturer, the EMA and the French authorities reveals, to varying degrees, a lack of rigor. The EMA has disregarded certain elements of prudence maintained by the manufacturer, while the manufacturer has allowed the only real clinical trial that might determine any benefit-risk balance to lapse. What is more the only study was restricted to the third trimester of pregnancy. The French authorities recommended mandatory injection of pregnant women caregivers and health-related professionals at a time when the manufacturer and the EMA could provide no guarantees.
制造商风险管理计划和欧洲药品管理局对孕妇陪同注射的评估:法国护理人员强制注射
本说明的目的是分析制造商风险管理计划(RMP)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)情况说明书中对孕妇社区疫苗接种的安全性评估,并衡量对建议的影响,这些建议导致法国孕妇护理人员和健康相关专业人员强制接种疫苗。安全性评价分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段(从2020年底到2022年初),疫苗对孕妇的安全性尚不清楚。在第二阶段,从2022年初开始,RMP和EMA报告的数据被认为是短期安全性的,但有限。长期安全性仍然未知。RMP是谨慎的,并建议有意注射孕妇仍将受到限制。制造商、EMA和法国当局对风险管理的详细分析显示,在不同程度上缺乏严谨性。EMA忽视了制造商所坚持的某些谨慎因素,而制造商却允许可能确定任何利益-风险平衡的唯一真正的临床试验失效。更重要的是,唯一的研究仅限于怀孕的第三个月。在制造商和EMA无法提供保证的情况下,法国当局建议对孕妇护理人员和与健康相关的专业人员进行强制注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信