Towards Open Justice: ICT Acceptance in the Greek Justice System the Case of the Integrated Court Management System for Penal and Civil Procedures (OSDDY/PP)

A. Deligiannis, D. Anagnostopoulos
{"title":"Towards Open Justice: ICT Acceptance in the Greek Justice System the Case of the Integrated Court Management System for Penal and Civil Procedures (OSDDY/PP)","authors":"A. Deligiannis, D. Anagnostopoulos","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2017.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Greek Ministry of Justice, Transparency and Human Rights (MoJTHR) has committed itself through the country's third Open Government Partnership Action Plan to significantly improve access to court data and documents. To achieve this, while simultaneously streamlining operating processes, it has adopted a new Integrated Court Management System for Penal and Civil procedures (OSDDY/PP), the first such ICT system to be introduced in Greece. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used in an effort to explore judges' and court officials' intent to work with the OSDDY/PP ICT system, as well as any possible differences in the degree of acceptance between the two user groups. The research sample consisted of 101 judges (N=56) and court officials (N=45). The study presents the usage patterns for judges and court officials of current ICT in courts as well as the acceptance, degree of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user intent to work with the new OSDDY/PP system. The results also highlight the sample's perceived benefits and risks in using the new ICT system.","PeriodicalId":240391,"journal":{"name":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Greek Ministry of Justice, Transparency and Human Rights (MoJTHR) has committed itself through the country's third Open Government Partnership Action Plan to significantly improve access to court data and documents. To achieve this, while simultaneously streamlining operating processes, it has adopted a new Integrated Court Management System for Penal and Civil procedures (OSDDY/PP), the first such ICT system to be introduced in Greece. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used in an effort to explore judges' and court officials' intent to work with the OSDDY/PP ICT system, as well as any possible differences in the degree of acceptance between the two user groups. The research sample consisted of 101 judges (N=56) and court officials (N=45). The study presents the usage patterns for judges and court officials of current ICT in courts as well as the acceptance, degree of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user intent to work with the new OSDDY/PP system. The results also highlight the sample's perceived benefits and risks in using the new ICT system.
走向开放的司法:信息通信技术在希腊司法系统的接受:刑事和民事程序的综合法院管理系统的案例(OSDDY/PP)
希腊司法、透明和人权部(MoJTHR)通过该国第三个开放政府伙伴关系行动计划,致力于显著改善法院数据和文件的获取。为了实现这一目标,在精简业务程序的同时,它采用了新的刑事和民事程序综合法院管理系统(OSDDY/PP),这是希腊将采用的第一个此类信息和通信技术系统。技术接受模型(TAM)用于探索法官和法院官员使用OSDDY/PP ICT系统的意图,以及两个用户群体之间接受程度的任何可能差异。研究样本包括101名法官(N=56)和法院工作人员(N=45)。这项研究提出了法官和法院官员在法庭上使用当前信息和通信技术的模式,以及接受程度、感知有用性程度、感知易用性和用户使用新的OSDDY/PP系统的意图。结果还突出了样本在使用新的ICT系统方面的感知收益和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信