Going it all alone in web entrepreneurship?: a comparison of single founders vs. co-founders

Olav Spiegel, Puja Abbassi, D. Schlagwein, K. Fischbach
{"title":"Going it all alone in web entrepreneurship?: a comparison of single founders vs. co-founders","authors":"Olav Spiegel, Puja Abbassi, D. Schlagwein, K. Fischbach","doi":"10.1145/2487294.2487301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a considerable amount of entrepreneurial activity in the information technology (IT) industry, especially in the Web. Many claim that the founders are the single most critical factor in startup success. The entrepreneurial self-efficacy theory and the jack-of-all-trades theory suggest that founders with diverse skills and broad experience will be able to successfully create a business alone. Alternatively, social capital theory suggests that founders who have high social capital and who engage in social networking will be able to go alone. Others, however, claim that team building is crucial for startup success as to bringing complementary skills together.\n In this study, we investigate if having a diverse skill set, higher experience, or more social connections is indeed a determinant of single founders, while co-founders have more specialized (yet complementary) skills. Our results are derived from analysis of 91 Web startups and their 183 (co-) founders. Contradicting existing theory, we could not find determinants for starting a new business alone. However, we find that co-founders do indeed complement each other's skills.\n Our results suggest that existing entrepreneurial theory needs to be expanded and revised to accommodate for the contradictions found and that future research is required in this area.","PeriodicalId":149561,"journal":{"name":"SIGMIS-CPR '13","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMIS-CPR '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2487294.2487301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

There is a considerable amount of entrepreneurial activity in the information technology (IT) industry, especially in the Web. Many claim that the founders are the single most critical factor in startup success. The entrepreneurial self-efficacy theory and the jack-of-all-trades theory suggest that founders with diverse skills and broad experience will be able to successfully create a business alone. Alternatively, social capital theory suggests that founders who have high social capital and who engage in social networking will be able to go alone. Others, however, claim that team building is crucial for startup success as to bringing complementary skills together. In this study, we investigate if having a diverse skill set, higher experience, or more social connections is indeed a determinant of single founders, while co-founders have more specialized (yet complementary) skills. Our results are derived from analysis of 91 Web startups and their 183 (co-) founders. Contradicting existing theory, we could not find determinants for starting a new business alone. However, we find that co-founders do indeed complement each other's skills. Our results suggest that existing entrepreneurial theory needs to be expanded and revised to accommodate for the contradictions found and that future research is required in this area.
独自从事网络创业?:单身创始人与联合创始人的比较
在信息技术(IT)行业,特别是在Web行业,有相当数量的企业活动。许多人声称创始人是创业成功的唯一最关键的因素。企业家自我效能理论和多面手理论表明,拥有多种技能和丰富经验的创始人能够独自成功创业。另外,社会资本理论认为,拥有高社会资本并参与社交网络的创始人将能够独自创业。然而,另一些人则认为,团队建设是创业成功的关键,因为它能将互补的技能结合在一起。在这项研究中,我们调查了拥有多样化的技能、更高的经验或更多的社会关系是否确实是单个创始人的决定因素,而联合创始人拥有更专业(但互补)的技能。我们的研究结果来自于对91家网络创业公司及其183位(共同)创始人的分析。与现有理论相反,我们找不到独自创业的决定因素。然而,我们发现联合创始人确实可以互补彼此的技能。我们的研究结果表明,现有的创业理论需要扩展和修正,以适应所发现的矛盾,并需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信