Pravni i medicinski aspekti nematerijalne štete

Dinka Šago
{"title":"Pravni i medicinski aspekti nematerijalne štete","authors":"Dinka Šago","doi":"10.18690/978-961-286-478-1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to analyze the applicability of Orientation Criteria of the Croatian Supreme Court from 2002. on determining compensation for non-pecuniary damage by the Law on Obligations from 2005. When Law on Obligations (2005) came into force, it essentially changed the system of compensation for non-pecuniary damage in such a way that, instead of the subjective concept of non-pecuniary damage, it introduced an objective concept of non-pecuniary damage.Attention is given to the basic problems in defining nonpecuniary damage and the recognition of the right to monetary compensation in personal injuries cases.","PeriodicalId":220685,"journal":{"name":"Medicina, pravo in družba: sodobne dileme IV","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina, pravo in družba: sodobne dileme IV","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-478-1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the applicability of Orientation Criteria of the Croatian Supreme Court from 2002. on determining compensation for non-pecuniary damage by the Law on Obligations from 2005. When Law on Obligations (2005) came into force, it essentially changed the system of compensation for non-pecuniary damage in such a way that, instead of the subjective concept of non-pecuniary damage, it introduced an objective concept of non-pecuniary damage.Attention is given to the basic problems in defining nonpecuniary damage and the recognition of the right to monetary compensation in personal injuries cases.
本文的目的是分析2002年以来克罗地亚最高法院取向标准的适用性。2005年《义务法》对非金钱损害赔偿的规定。2005年的《义务法》从本质上改变了非金钱损害赔偿制度,从主观的非金钱损害概念改为客观的非金钱损害概念。对人身伤害案件中非金钱损害的界定和金钱赔偿权的认定等基本问题进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信