Political Participation of the Brazilian Indigenous Movement and the Effectiveness of Fundamental Human Rights

L. Ferreira, Ana Claudia Santano, Verçulina Firmino dos Santos
{"title":"Political Participation of the Brazilian Indigenous Movement and the Effectiveness of Fundamental Human Rights","authors":"L. Ferreira, Ana Claudia Santano, Verçulina Firmino dos Santos","doi":"10.4236/BLR.2021.121006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attends with the relationship between the indigenous movement and the public sphere through political participation as a means of realizing human dignity according to Brazilian and Latin American perspectives. The objective is to qualify the performance of this movement in the Brazilian public sphere through the National Council for Indigenous Policy (originally CNPI) and the prior consultation protocol provided for in ILO Convention No. 169. The levels and degrees of participation of Juan E. Diaz Bordenave and the levels of the public sphere of John Keane are considered. The exploratory and comparative study involves indirect documentation. The findings’ analysis suggests that the political participation of the indigenous movement in CNPI is limited to the meso-public sphere of spaces institutionalized by the state’s government, with little capacity for political protagonism. In contrast, the implementation of the prior consultation protocols articulates the different levels of the public sphere. It expresses greater political protagonism of Brazilian indigenous peoples, which can provide a more effective Brazilian indigenous people’s political intervention system toward gathering comprehensively fundamental human rights of different dimensions in promoting human dignity.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/BLR.2021.121006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper attends with the relationship between the indigenous movement and the public sphere through political participation as a means of realizing human dignity according to Brazilian and Latin American perspectives. The objective is to qualify the performance of this movement in the Brazilian public sphere through the National Council for Indigenous Policy (originally CNPI) and the prior consultation protocol provided for in ILO Convention No. 169. The levels and degrees of participation of Juan E. Diaz Bordenave and the levels of the public sphere of John Keane are considered. The exploratory and comparative study involves indirect documentation. The findings’ analysis suggests that the political participation of the indigenous movement in CNPI is limited to the meso-public sphere of spaces institutionalized by the state’s government, with little capacity for political protagonism. In contrast, the implementation of the prior consultation protocols articulates the different levels of the public sphere. It expresses greater political protagonism of Brazilian indigenous peoples, which can provide a more effective Brazilian indigenous people’s political intervention system toward gathering comprehensively fundamental human rights of different dimensions in promoting human dignity.
巴西土著运动的政治参与和基本人权的有效性
本文根据巴西和拉丁美洲的观点,通过政治参与作为实现人类尊严的一种手段,关注土著运动与公共领域之间的关系。其目标是通过土著政策全国委员会(原来是土著人民政策委员会)和劳工组织第169号公约规定的事先协商议定书,使这一运动在巴西公共领域的表现有资格。Juan E. Diaz Bordenave的参与水平和程度以及John Keane的公共领域水平被考虑在内。探索性和比较性研究涉及间接文献。研究结果的分析表明,CNPI的土著运动的政治参与仅限于国家政府制度化的中公共空间,几乎没有政治主角的能力。相比之下,事先协商议定书的执行阐明了公共领域的不同层次。它表达了巴西土著人民更大的政治主角地位,这可以提供一个更有效的巴西土著人民政治干预制度,以便在促进人类尊严方面全面收集不同层面的基本人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信