Santulli Enterostomy: A Considerable Method for Patients Who Require Proximal Enterostomy

K. Ihn, Eun-jung Koo, I. Ho, S. Han, J. Oh
{"title":"Santulli Enterostomy: A Considerable Method for Patients Who Require Proximal Enterostomy","authors":"K. Ihn, Eun-jung Koo, I. Ho, S. Han, J. Oh","doi":"10.13029/JKAPS.2018.24.1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Santulli enterostomy has been used for various surgical abdominal conditions that require temporary diversion of bowel during a neonatal period. The aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes of Santulli enterostomy and to evaluate its usefulness. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2016, 40 neonates who underwent Santulli enterostomy were enrolled; Santulli enterostomies were performed for 25 patients without previous laparotomy (primary Santulli group) and 15 patients with previous laparotomy (secondary Santulli group). Results: Small bowel atresia is the first common indication of Santulli enterostomy (22/40, 55.0%), and luminal discrepancy between proximal and distal bowel was the most common determinant factor of Santulli enterostomy (17/40, 42.5%). The median age at surgery and mean birth weight were 2 days and 2,480 g respectively in the primary group, and 71 days, 2,340 g respectively in the secondary group. Operation time was significantly longer in the secondary group than the primary group (156±48 minutes vs. 224±95 minutes, p=0.019), and there was no difference in the time taken to initiation of oral feeding between the two groups. Santulli enterostomy closure was performed at median 65 days after Santulli enterostomy for primary group and 70 days for secondary group. Six complications (15.0%) were found after Santulli enterostomy, and nine complications (24.3%) after Santulli enterostomy closure (p=0.302). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in secondary group than in primary group (4.5% vs. 53.3%, p=0.001), and the reoperation rate was also significantly higher in the secondary group (4.5% vs. 46.7%, p=0.004). Conclusion: Santulli enterostomy could be applied as a temporary enterostomy in neonatal patients with various surgical abdominal diseases. Considering the high complication rate after secondary Santulli enterostomy closure, decision making on the timing of enterostomy closure should be done with caution.","PeriodicalId":164943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13029/JKAPS.2018.24.1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Santulli enterostomy has been used for various surgical abdominal conditions that require temporary diversion of bowel during a neonatal period. The aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes of Santulli enterostomy and to evaluate its usefulness. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2016, 40 neonates who underwent Santulli enterostomy were enrolled; Santulli enterostomies were performed for 25 patients without previous laparotomy (primary Santulli group) and 15 patients with previous laparotomy (secondary Santulli group). Results: Small bowel atresia is the first common indication of Santulli enterostomy (22/40, 55.0%), and luminal discrepancy between proximal and distal bowel was the most common determinant factor of Santulli enterostomy (17/40, 42.5%). The median age at surgery and mean birth weight were 2 days and 2,480 g respectively in the primary group, and 71 days, 2,340 g respectively in the secondary group. Operation time was significantly longer in the secondary group than the primary group (156±48 minutes vs. 224±95 minutes, p=0.019), and there was no difference in the time taken to initiation of oral feeding between the two groups. Santulli enterostomy closure was performed at median 65 days after Santulli enterostomy for primary group and 70 days for secondary group. Six complications (15.0%) were found after Santulli enterostomy, and nine complications (24.3%) after Santulli enterostomy closure (p=0.302). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in secondary group than in primary group (4.5% vs. 53.3%, p=0.001), and the reoperation rate was also significantly higher in the secondary group (4.5% vs. 46.7%, p=0.004). Conclusion: Santulli enterostomy could be applied as a temporary enterostomy in neonatal patients with various surgical abdominal diseases. Considering the high complication rate after secondary Santulli enterostomy closure, decision making on the timing of enterostomy closure should be done with caution.
Santulli肠造口术:对于需要近端肠造口的患者是一种相当好的方法
目的:Santulli肠造口术已用于各种外科腹部条件,需要暂时转移肠在新生儿时期。本研究的目的是报告Santulli肠造口术的临床结果并评估其有效性。方法:2000年1月至2016年12月,选取40例接受Santulli肠造口术的新生儿;25例无剖腹手术史的患者(一次Santulli组)和15例有剖腹手术史的患者(二次Santulli组)行Santulli肠造口术。结果:小肠闭锁是Santulli肠造口术的第一个常见适应症(22/40,55.0%),近端和远端肠管腔差异是Santulli肠造口术最常见的决定因素(17/40,42.5%)。第一组的中位手术年龄和平均出生体重分别为2天和2480 g,第二组分别为71天和2340 g。第二组手术时间明显长于第一组(156±48 min vs. 224±95 min, p=0.019),两组开始口服喂养所需时间无差异。第一组Santulli肠造口术后中位时间为65天,第二组为70天。Santulli肠造口术后并发症6例(15.0%),关闭Santulli肠造口术后并发症9例(24.3%)(p=0.302)。继发组并发症发生率显著高于原发性组(4.5%比53.3%,p=0.001),再手术率显著高于原发性组(4.5%比46.7%,p=0.004)。结论:Santulli肠造口术可作为新生儿各种腹部外科疾病的临时肠造口术。考虑到二次Santulli肠造口术后并发症发生率高,应慎重选择肠造口闭合时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信