Molecular systematics of the Capoeta (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) species complex inferred from mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence data

C. Turan
{"title":"Molecular systematics of the Capoeta (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) species complex inferred from mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence data","authors":"C. Turan","doi":"10.3409/AZC.51A_1-2.1-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capoeta species from Anatolia, Turkey were studied using mitochondrial 16S rDNA gene sequencing to determine whether traditionally defined species and subspecies correspond to taxonomic entities. The systematic topology and genetic divergence for C. antalyensis, C. pestai, C. tinca, C. trutta, C. damascina and C. barroisi was enough to classify them as different species. The 16S rDNA data does not corroborate the use of the classic subspecies nomenclature for C. c. angorae, C. c. capoeta and C. c. sieboldi, but supports the use of species nomenclature for C. angorae, C. capoeta and C. sieboldi. On the other hand the genetic evidence does not support the classic subspecies designation for C.c. umbla and C.c. koswigi because no fixed differences were observed between them. The systematic topology and haplotype differences between these lineages may suggest that these two subspecies are genetically contiguous, and are a member of the species C. trutta. Based on combined molecular and morphologic data, the present study suggests that two undescribed Capoeta species may exist in Anatolia; one species in the Goksu River, and the second species in the Dalaman stream. The 16S mtDNA gene is a useful genetic marker for species and subspecies identification of the genus Capoeta because of its interspecific heterogeneity producing a species specific pattern.","PeriodicalId":267323,"journal":{"name":"Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia - Series A: Vertebrata","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia - Series A: Vertebrata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3409/AZC.51A_1-2.1-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Capoeta species from Anatolia, Turkey were studied using mitochondrial 16S rDNA gene sequencing to determine whether traditionally defined species and subspecies correspond to taxonomic entities. The systematic topology and genetic divergence for C. antalyensis, C. pestai, C. tinca, C. trutta, C. damascina and C. barroisi was enough to classify them as different species. The 16S rDNA data does not corroborate the use of the classic subspecies nomenclature for C. c. angorae, C. c. capoeta and C. c. sieboldi, but supports the use of species nomenclature for C. angorae, C. capoeta and C. sieboldi. On the other hand the genetic evidence does not support the classic subspecies designation for C.c. umbla and C.c. koswigi because no fixed differences were observed between them. The systematic topology and haplotype differences between these lineages may suggest that these two subspecies are genetically contiguous, and are a member of the species C. trutta. Based on combined molecular and morphologic data, the present study suggests that two undescribed Capoeta species may exist in Anatolia; one species in the Goksu River, and the second species in the Dalaman stream. The 16S mtDNA gene is a useful genetic marker for species and subspecies identification of the genus Capoeta because of its interspecific heterogeneity producing a species specific pattern.
从线粒体16S rDNA序列数据推断的Capoeta(鲤形目:鲤科)种复合体的分子系统学
采用线粒体16S rDNA基因测序对土耳其安纳托利亚的卡波塔(Capoeta)物种进行了研究,以确定传统定义的种和亚种是否与分类实体相对应。C. antalyensis、C. pestai、C. tinca、C. trutta、C. damascina和C. barroisi的系统拓扑结构和遗传差异足以将它们划分为不同的种。16S rDNA数据不支持使用经典的亚种命名法来命名安哥拉c.c. capoeta和西博尔迪,但支持使用种命名法来命名安哥拉c.c. capoeta和西博尔迪。另一方面,遗传证据也不支持对黄卷草和黄卷草的经典亚种命名,因为它们之间没有固定的差异。这些谱系之间的系统拓扑结构和单倍型差异可能表明这两个亚种在遗传上是相邻的,并且是C. trutta物种的成员。基于分子和形态学资料,本研究认为在安纳托利亚可能存在两个未被描述的Capoeta种;一种分布在谷苏江,另一种分布在达拉满河。16S mtDNA基因具有种间异质性和种间特异性,是一种有用的亚种鉴定遗传标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信