LABOR CAPACITY OF DEAF WORKERS ON THE WORKPLACE: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ATTITUDES OF DEAF WORKERS AND THEIR CO-WORKERS WITHOUT HEARING IMPAIRMENT

Admira Beha, Husnija Hasanbegović
{"title":"LABOR CAPACITY OF DEAF WORKERS ON THE WORKPLACE: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ATTITUDES OF DEAF WORKERS AND THEIR CO-WORKERS WITHOUT HEARING IMPAIRMENT","authors":"Admira Beha, Husnija Hasanbegović","doi":"10.21554/hrr.091906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to determine the opinions of deaf workers on their labor capacity and the opinions of their hearing co-workers about the labor capacities of the deaf. The sample consisted of 247 respondents, of whom 127 were deaf and 120 were hearing workers. Qualitative and quantitative analysis were used in processing the results. Testing was performed by Wilks' Lambda, tested significance in discriminant analysis was done by F test, at the statistical significance of 0.01. It was found that the sub-sample of respondents had a statistically significant difference in views on claims regarding the exploitation of deaf workers by employers, the employment of deaf people in low-paid simple occupations, and the equally successful but insignificant productivity of deaf workers. The statistical differences found indicate that there are differences in the assessment of the labor capacity of deaf workers in the hearing work environment. Qualitative analysis found that hearing impairment and the subjective attitudes of colleagues without hearing impairment have the greatest impact on the assessment of the labor capacity of deaf workers.","PeriodicalId":431886,"journal":{"name":"Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.091906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine the opinions of deaf workers on their labor capacity and the opinions of their hearing co-workers about the labor capacities of the deaf. The sample consisted of 247 respondents, of whom 127 were deaf and 120 were hearing workers. Qualitative and quantitative analysis were used in processing the results. Testing was performed by Wilks' Lambda, tested significance in discriminant analysis was done by F test, at the statistical significance of 0.01. It was found that the sub-sample of respondents had a statistically significant difference in views on claims regarding the exploitation of deaf workers by employers, the employment of deaf people in low-paid simple occupations, and the equally successful but insignificant productivity of deaf workers. The statistical differences found indicate that there are differences in the assessment of the labor capacity of deaf workers in the hearing work environment. Qualitative analysis found that hearing impairment and the subjective attitudes of colleagues without hearing impairment have the greatest impact on the assessment of the labor capacity of deaf workers.
聋人工人在工作场所的劳动能力:聋人工人及其非听障同事态度的定性分析
本文的目的是确定聋人工人对自己劳动能力的看法,以及他们的听力同事对聋人劳动能力的看法。样本包括247名受访者,其中127人是聋人,120人是听力正常的工人。对结果进行定性和定量分析。采用Wilks’Lambda检验,判别分析中检验显著性采用F检验,显著性为0.01。调查发现,被调查者的子样本对雇主剥削聋人工人、雇用聋人从事低薪简单职业以及聋人工人同样成功但生产力微不足道的主张的看法有统计学上的显著差异。发现的统计差异表明,聋人工人在听力工作环境下的劳动能力评估存在差异。定性分析发现,听力障碍和非听力障碍同事的主观态度对聋人工人劳动能力评价的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信