Evaluation of Error Metrics for Image Registration of Multiple Images

Prakash Duraisamny, Kamnesh Namnuduri, S. Jackson
{"title":"Evaluation of Error Metrics for Image Registration of Multiple Images","authors":"Prakash Duraisamny, Kamnesh Namnuduri, S. Jackson","doi":"10.1109/ICCCNT.2010.5635425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When two or more images of a scene are joined, one would like to know the accuracy of the joined image. In this paper we carry out a comparison of several different error metrics which are computed directly from the given images and their join (i.e., no \"ground truth\" value is assumed). We compare the error metrics by correlating them with a map registration error which we regard as a \"ground truth\" or \"gold standard.\" The goal is to have a notion of reliability of the different error metrics which will be valid when ground truth reference is not available. This analysis should be a useful tool for quantifying aspects of image registration algorithms and for tuning the parameters of the registration algorithm.","PeriodicalId":134352,"journal":{"name":"2010 Second International conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Second International conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2010.5635425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When two or more images of a scene are joined, one would like to know the accuracy of the joined image. In this paper we carry out a comparison of several different error metrics which are computed directly from the given images and their join (i.e., no "ground truth" value is assumed). We compare the error metrics by correlating them with a map registration error which we regard as a "ground truth" or "gold standard." The goal is to have a notion of reliability of the different error metrics which will be valid when ground truth reference is not available. This analysis should be a useful tool for quantifying aspects of image registration algorithms and for tuning the parameters of the registration algorithm.
多图像配准误差度量的评价
当一个场景的两幅或多幅图像被连接起来时,人们想知道连接图像的准确性。在本文中,我们对几种不同的误差度量进行了比较,这些误差度量是直接从给定的图像及其连接(即,不假设“基础真值”)计算出来的。我们通过将误差度量与我们认为是“基本事实”或“黄金标准”的地图注册误差相关联来比较误差度量。目标是有一个不同误差度量的可靠性的概念,这将是有效的,当地面真值参考是不可用的。这种分析应该是一个有用的工具,量化方面的图像配准算法和调优的配准算法的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信