Constitution of the Republic of Serbia- Shorter commentary on articles (why it must be amended?) (I)

Darian Rakitovan
{"title":"Constitution of the Republic of Serbia- Shorter commentary on articles (why it must be amended?) (I)","authors":"Darian Rakitovan","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-4-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the referendum, on the 8th of November, 2006, the Assembly of the Republic of \nSerbia promulgated the currently valid Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. \nHowever, from the moment of its adoption, this Constitution was subjected to a \ngreat deal of criticism. Even the manner of its adoption was disputed. Currently, \nthere are numerous demands for its amendment. Political parties in Serbia also \nmore or less agree that the current Constitution should be amended, especially \nin the light of European integrations. Most frequently heard objections are to \nthe provisions regarding the too high number of deputies in the Parliament, the \ncontent of the preamble, provisions regarding judiciary, the matter of \nregionalization etc. \nThis paper reviews and provides a short commentary on certain provisions of \nthe Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, which we deem necessary to be \npointed out when debating this matter. Particular focus is placed on certain \nnormative solutions which we believe are not adequately regulated, i.e. those \nprovisions we believe should be altered in order to adapt this supreme legal act \nto the intentions of Serbia to become a full member of the European Union, and \nwhich are at the same time in the interest of the citizens of Serbia.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-4-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the referendum, on the 8th of November, 2006, the Assembly of the Republic of Serbia promulgated the currently valid Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. However, from the moment of its adoption, this Constitution was subjected to a great deal of criticism. Even the manner of its adoption was disputed. Currently, there are numerous demands for its amendment. Political parties in Serbia also more or less agree that the current Constitution should be amended, especially in the light of European integrations. Most frequently heard objections are to the provisions regarding the too high number of deputies in the Parliament, the content of the preamble, provisions regarding judiciary, the matter of regionalization etc. This paper reviews and provides a short commentary on certain provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, which we deem necessary to be pointed out when debating this matter. Particular focus is placed on certain normative solutions which we believe are not adequately regulated, i.e. those provisions we believe should be altered in order to adapt this supreme legal act to the intentions of Serbia to become a full member of the European Union, and which are at the same time in the interest of the citizens of Serbia.
塞尔维亚共和国宪法-对条款的简短评论(为什么必须修改?)(一)
在全民公决之后,2006年11月8日,塞尔维亚共和国议会颁布了现行有效的塞尔维亚共和国宪法。然而,从通过的那一刻起,这部宪法就受到了大量的批评。甚至通过的方式也存在争议。目前,有许多人要求对其进行修改。塞尔维亚各政党也或多或少同意修改现行宪法,特别是考虑到欧洲一体化。最常听到的反对意见是关于议会议员人数过多的规定、序言的内容、关于司法的规定、区域化问题等。本文对《塞尔维亚共和国宪法》的某些条款进行了审查和简短评论,我们认为在辩论这一问题时有必要指出这些条款。我们特别关注某些规范性解决办法,我们认为这些办法没有得到充分的管制,即我们认为应该修改这些规定,以便使这项最高法律行为适应塞尔维亚成为欧洲联盟正式成员的意图,同时也符合塞尔维亚公民的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信