The Immanent Root

J. P. Baggett
{"title":"The Immanent Root","authors":"J. P. Baggett","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479874200.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores atheists’ common contention that their moral sensibilities represent progress over those expressed by people of faith. Atheists generally contend that morality is not derived from religious worldviews, that most morally decent religious people actually get their ethics from the same secular sources as do atheists, and that overall atheists are actually more moral than their religious fellow citizens. They also claim that atheist morality represents progress from its religious counterparts because, requiring little by way of systematic thinking or heroic levels of obligation, it is more achievable in everyday life, and since it is imparted to individuals through societal norms and institutions, its requirements are actually more accessible to people who thus do not need to rely upon others’ expertise in discerning ethical positions.","PeriodicalId":300188,"journal":{"name":"The Varieties of Nonreligious Experience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Varieties of Nonreligious Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479874200.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores atheists’ common contention that their moral sensibilities represent progress over those expressed by people of faith. Atheists generally contend that morality is not derived from religious worldviews, that most morally decent religious people actually get their ethics from the same secular sources as do atheists, and that overall atheists are actually more moral than their religious fellow citizens. They also claim that atheist morality represents progress from its religious counterparts because, requiring little by way of systematic thinking or heroic levels of obligation, it is more achievable in everyday life, and since it is imparted to individuals through societal norms and institutions, its requirements are actually more accessible to people who thus do not need to rely upon others’ expertise in discerning ethical positions.
内在的根源
这一章探讨了无神论者的共同论点,即他们的道德敏感性代表了那些有信仰的人所表达的进步。无神论者通常认为,道德不是来自宗教世界观,大多数道德上体面的宗教人士实际上和无神论者一样,都是从同样的世俗来源获得道德的,而且总的来说,无神论者实际上比他们的宗教同胞更有道德。他们还声称,无神论道德代表了相对于宗教道德的进步,因为它几乎不需要系统思考或英雄级的义务,在日常生活中更容易实现,而且由于它是通过社会规范和制度传授给个人的,它的要求实际上更容易为人们所接受,因此不需要依靠他人的专业知识来辨别道德立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信