Quality in higher education: an evaluation in a graduation course in administration at a large university in the municipality of São Paulo

Alexandre Mendes da Silva, M. A. Gouvêa, Bárbara Ilze Semensato, F. Pereira
{"title":"Quality in higher education: an evaluation in a graduation course in administration at a large university in the municipality of São Paulo","authors":"Alexandre Mendes da Silva, M. A. Gouvêa, Bárbara Ilze Semensato, F. Pereira","doi":"10.5902/1983465967056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to assess the quality perceived by students in the on-site undergraduate course in administration at a private university located in the city of São Paulo, using a new scale developed from the skills expected in the training of future administrators.\nDesign/Methodology/Approach: a 46-item questionnaire was developed and tested, with multivariate statistical techniques (exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha). In total, 629 students participated in the study.\n \nResults: the study identified four blocks of competences: managerial skills, problem solving, proactivity, communication, and creativity and techniques. In the global assessment of the quality of educational services, the institution achieved 76.19%, which indicates that the Administration course offered by the institution can be considered of good quality. The work delivers an instrument and an evaluation methodology that can be used to improve administration courses in the country.\n \nOriginality/value: the study is relevant when assessing the quality of higher education from a new scale based on the skills required to exercise the profession of an administrator defined by Resolution No. 4 of July 13th, 2005.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465967056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to assess the quality perceived by students in the on-site undergraduate course in administration at a private university located in the city of São Paulo, using a new scale developed from the skills expected in the training of future administrators. Design/Methodology/Approach: a 46-item questionnaire was developed and tested, with multivariate statistical techniques (exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha). In total, 629 students participated in the study.   Results: the study identified four blocks of competences: managerial skills, problem solving, proactivity, communication, and creativity and techniques. In the global assessment of the quality of educational services, the institution achieved 76.19%, which indicates that the Administration course offered by the institution can be considered of good quality. The work delivers an instrument and an evaluation methodology that can be used to improve administration courses in the country.   Originality/value: the study is relevant when assessing the quality of higher education from a new scale based on the skills required to exercise the profession of an administrator defined by Resolution No. 4 of July 13th, 2005.
高等教育的质量:对圣保罗市一所大型大学行政管理专业毕业课程的评估
目的:评估圣保罗市一所私立大学现场管理本科课程的学生所感知的质量,使用从未来管理人员培训预期技能发展而来的新量表。设计/方法/方法:采用多元统计技术(探索性因子分析和Cronbach’s alpha),设计并测试了一份46项的问卷。总共有629名学生参与了这项研究。结果:该研究确定了四种能力:管理技能、解决问题能力、主动性、沟通能力、创造力和技巧。在教育服务质量的全球评估中,该机构的得分为76.19%,这表明该机构提供的行政管理课程可以被认为是质量良好的。这项工作提供了一种工具和一种评价方法,可用于改进该国的行政管理课程。原创性/价值:根据2005年7月13日第4号决议所规定的行政管理人员职业所需的技能,从一个新的尺度来评估高等教育的质量,这项研究是相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信