An incremental brake force protocol for arm crank anaerobic testing of wheelchair athletes

S. Mercer, P. Beehler
{"title":"An incremental brake force protocol for arm crank anaerobic testing of wheelchair athletes","authors":"S. Mercer, P. Beehler","doi":"10.1080/15438620109512102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT) paradigm of setting cycle brake resistance relative to body weight has limited value in a lower limb impaired population. The purpose of this investigation is to define a loading scheme that elicits optimal performance of a wheelchair athlete on a WAnT using the Monark 881 arm‐crank ergometer. Seventeen elite male wheelchair basketball athletes performed a randomized series of 30 second WAnTs at four absolute brake force loads (3.50, 4.25, 5.00, and 5.75 kg) and an additional single 10 second maximal velocity WAnT using a 3.00kg load. A repeated measures ANOVA identified a significant difference in peak power {p < .01, F(3,47) = 25.46} and in mean power output {p < .01, F(3, 47) = 30.39} attributable to the variation in load. Post hoc analysis indicated that the mean optimal load for this elite group was the highest load examined. The relationship of each individual's optimal load with peak performance (average revolutions/minute for the peak 3 seconds) on a. 10 second maximal velocity test (MV3) was then used to develop a testing scheme in which an absolute load may be proposed to measure anaerobic power optimally based on performance in a maximal velocity test. Additional testing is recommended to expand this model to include non‐elite wheelchair users.","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620109512102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT) paradigm of setting cycle brake resistance relative to body weight has limited value in a lower limb impaired population. The purpose of this investigation is to define a loading scheme that elicits optimal performance of a wheelchair athlete on a WAnT using the Monark 881 arm‐crank ergometer. Seventeen elite male wheelchair basketball athletes performed a randomized series of 30 second WAnTs at four absolute brake force loads (3.50, 4.25, 5.00, and 5.75 kg) and an additional single 10 second maximal velocity WAnT using a 3.00kg load. A repeated measures ANOVA identified a significant difference in peak power {p < .01, F(3,47) = 25.46} and in mean power output {p < .01, F(3, 47) = 30.39} attributable to the variation in load. Post hoc analysis indicated that the mean optimal load for this elite group was the highest load examined. The relationship of each individual's optimal load with peak performance (average revolutions/minute for the peak 3 seconds) on a. 10 second maximal velocity test (MV3) was then used to develop a testing scheme in which an absolute load may be proposed to measure anaerobic power optimally based on performance in a maximal velocity test. Additional testing is recommended to expand this model to include non‐elite wheelchair users.
轮椅运动员臂曲柄无氧测试的增量制动力方案
设定相对于体重的循环制动阻力的传统Wingate厌氧试验(WAnT)范例在下肢受损人群中价值有限。本研究的目的是定义一种加载方案,该方案可以在使用Monark 881臂曲柄测力仪的情况下激发轮椅运动员在WAnT上的最佳表现。17名优秀的男性轮椅篮球运动员在4种绝对制动力负荷(3.50、4.25、5.00和5.75 kg)下随机进行了30秒的WAnT,在3.00kg负荷下进行了另外一次10秒的最大速度WAnT。重复测量方差分析发现,由于负荷的变化,峰值功率{p < 0.01, F(3,47) = 25.46}和平均功率输出{p < 0.01, F(3,47) = 30.39}存在显著差异。事后分析表明,这个精英组的平均最佳负荷是最高负荷。然后使用10秒最大速度测试(MV3)中每个人的最佳负荷与峰值性能(峰值3秒的平均转数/分钟)的关系来开发一个测试方案,其中可以提出一个绝对负荷来根据最大速度测试中的性能最佳地测量无氧功率。建议进行额外的测试以扩展该模型,包括非精英轮椅使用者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信