THE COMPARISON BETWEEN MONOTHERAPY AND POLYTHERAPY IN EPILEPSY IDIOPATHIC GENERALISED TONIC CLONIC

Ratna Wijayatri, Z. Ikawati, Abdul Ghofir
{"title":"THE COMPARISON BETWEEN MONOTHERAPY AND POLYTHERAPY IN EPILEPSY IDIOPATHIC GENERALISED TONIC CLONIC","authors":"Ratna Wijayatri, Z. Ikawati, Abdul Ghofir","doi":"10.22146/JMPF.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of epilepsy in the world reachs 5-20 per 1000 population. In Indonesia, the prevalence of epilepsy is approximately at 0.5-1.2%. Antiepilepsy drug has an important role in the epilepsy treatment. This study was aimed to know the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy treatment compared to polytherapy in terms of seizure frequency, seizure-free duration, and adverse drug reaction. This study was the observational research. The data were collected prospectively using instruments i.e.: seizure diaries and APS (Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale). Subject of this study were epileptic patient with idiopathic generalized tonic clonic who receive either polytherapy or monotherapy in neurological clinic of Dr. Sardjito Hospital on May-June 2012 period, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The data from monotherapy and polytherapy group was analysed in term of seizure frequency, seizure-free duration and adverse drug reaction. Result showed that monotherapy treatment more effective in controlling seizure (reduce the frequency of seizure) compared to polytherapy (<0.05). Percentage of seizure free was 83% in monotherapy compared to 48% in polytherapy. The prevalence of adverse drug reaction was about 20% in monotherapy and 14% in polytherapy. Based on the interview, although monotherapy caused more adverse drug reaction than that in polytherapy, the drug adverse reaction in monotherapy was milder and did not annoy patient convenience. Keywords: Epilepsy, Idiopathic Generalised Tonic Clonic, Monotherapy, Polytherapy, Adverse Drug Reaction","PeriodicalId":125871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Pharmacy Practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/JMPF.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of epilepsy in the world reachs 5-20 per 1000 population. In Indonesia, the prevalence of epilepsy is approximately at 0.5-1.2%. Antiepilepsy drug has an important role in the epilepsy treatment. This study was aimed to know the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy treatment compared to polytherapy in terms of seizure frequency, seizure-free duration, and adverse drug reaction. This study was the observational research. The data were collected prospectively using instruments i.e.: seizure diaries and APS (Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale). Subject of this study were epileptic patient with idiopathic generalized tonic clonic who receive either polytherapy or monotherapy in neurological clinic of Dr. Sardjito Hospital on May-June 2012 period, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The data from monotherapy and polytherapy group was analysed in term of seizure frequency, seizure-free duration and adverse drug reaction. Result showed that monotherapy treatment more effective in controlling seizure (reduce the frequency of seizure) compared to polytherapy (<0.05). Percentage of seizure free was 83% in monotherapy compared to 48% in polytherapy. The prevalence of adverse drug reaction was about 20% in monotherapy and 14% in polytherapy. Based on the interview, although monotherapy caused more adverse drug reaction than that in polytherapy, the drug adverse reaction in monotherapy was milder and did not annoy patient convenience. Keywords: Epilepsy, Idiopathic Generalised Tonic Clonic, Monotherapy, Polytherapy, Adverse Drug Reaction
单一疗法与综合疗法治疗癫痫特发性全身性强直性阵挛的比较
全世界癫痫发病率达到每1000人中5-20人。在印度尼西亚,癫痫的患病率约为0.5-1.2%。抗癫痫药物在癫痫治疗中具有重要作用。本研究旨在了解单药治疗与多药治疗在癫痫发作频率、无发作持续时间和药物不良反应方面的有效性和安全性。这项研究是观察性研究。前瞻性数据收集工具为:癫痫发作日记和APS(药物不良反应概率量表)。本研究对象为2012年5 - 6月在Dr. Sardjito医院神经内科门诊接受综合治疗或单一治疗的特发性全身性强直性阵挛癫痫患者,符合纳入标准。对单药组和多药组患者的癫痫发作频率、无发作持续时间及药物不良反应进行分析。结果显示单药治疗在控制癫痫发作(减少癫痫发作次数)方面优于多药治疗(<0.05)。单药治疗无癫痫发作的比例为83%,而复合治疗为48%。药物不良反应发生率单药组为20%,复合药组为14%。通过访谈得知,虽然单药治疗引起的药物不良反应多于多药治疗,但单药治疗的药物不良反应较轻,不会给患者带来不便。关键词:癫痫,特发性全身性强直阵挛,单一疗法,综合疗法,药物不良反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信