The Causes of Penalty Aggravation in the Penal Code of Afghanistan, and the Islamic Penal Law of Iran: A Comparative Study

Mahfuzullah Arify, Noorullah Noori Mojaddadi
{"title":"The Causes of Penalty Aggravation in the Penal Code of Afghanistan, and the Islamic Penal Law of Iran: A Comparative Study","authors":"Mahfuzullah Arify, Noorullah Noori Mojaddadi","doi":"10.58425/ajlps.v2i3.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The primary aim of this study was to examine the causes of the aggravation of punishment in the penal code of Afghanistan and compares it to the Islamic penal Law of Iran to specify additional causes of aggravation. \nMethods: This study is qualitative in nature and was conducted using a comparative research design, in which the penal code of Afghanistan was compared with the Islamic Penal Law of Iran. In addition to the laws of both countries, various legal books have been used to investigate this issue. \nResults: The penal code of Afghanistan has covered many necessary causes in terms of penalty aggravation, but some other causes, such as crimes on sacred days and places, removing the amount from the use of explosives, committing some crimes by foreign nationals and others are not considered as causes of aggravation, such as in the Islamic Penal law. \nConclusion:  The penal code Afghanistan had neglected some important issues, which is included in the Islamic penal law of Iran, which made it easy for the criminals to commit some heavy and serious crimes. \nRecommendation: As the new interim government need to have the penal code, they should consider all those important causes which have identified in this study and another literature.","PeriodicalId":302325,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law and Political Science","volume":"133 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58425/ajlps.v2i3.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The primary aim of this study was to examine the causes of the aggravation of punishment in the penal code of Afghanistan and compares it to the Islamic penal Law of Iran to specify additional causes of aggravation. Methods: This study is qualitative in nature and was conducted using a comparative research design, in which the penal code of Afghanistan was compared with the Islamic Penal Law of Iran. In addition to the laws of both countries, various legal books have been used to investigate this issue. Results: The penal code of Afghanistan has covered many necessary causes in terms of penalty aggravation, but some other causes, such as crimes on sacred days and places, removing the amount from the use of explosives, committing some crimes by foreign nationals and others are not considered as causes of aggravation, such as in the Islamic Penal law. Conclusion:  The penal code Afghanistan had neglected some important issues, which is included in the Islamic penal law of Iran, which made it easy for the criminals to commit some heavy and serious crimes. Recommendation: As the new interim government need to have the penal code, they should consider all those important causes which have identified in this study and another literature.
阿富汗刑法与伊朗伊斯兰刑法中刑罚加重的原因比较研究
目的:本研究的主要目的是审查阿富汗刑法中加重刑罚的原因,并将其与伊朗伊斯兰刑法进行比较,以具体说明加重刑罚的其他原因。方法:本研究为定性研究,采用比较研究设计,将阿富汗刑法与伊朗伊斯兰刑法进行比较。除了两国的法律之外,各种法律书籍也被用来调查这个问题。结果:阿富汗刑法涵盖了加重刑罚的许多必要原因,但其他一些原因,如在神圣的日子和地点犯罪、从使用炸药中扣除数额、外国人犯下某些罪行和其他不被认为是加重的原因,如伊斯兰刑法。结论:阿富汗刑法忽略了一些重要的问题,这些问题被纳入伊朗伊斯兰刑法,这使得罪犯容易犯下一些严重的罪行。建议:由于新的临时政府需要有刑法,他们应该考虑在本研究和其他文献中确定的所有重要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信