Big Pharma and Investment Arbitration

S. Manciaux
{"title":"Big Pharma and Investment Arbitration","authors":"S. Manciaux","doi":"10.2478/vjls-2021-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Investment Arbitration in the pharmaceutical sector raises some specificities. Regarding jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals, it is questionable whether the registration of a patent abroad or a patent license granted to a foreign partner constitutes an investment. Similarly, as health products are not ordinary goods, arguments according to which marketing authorizations or monopolies granted constitute an investment are real issues. On the merits, the invalidation of a patent, the refusal or withdrawal of a marketing authorization or the decision of a state authority to end a monopoly can be analyzed as a violation of some of the commitments made by States in the treaties they conclude. The aim of this study is to address these questions thanks to the awards already rendered, making it a useful tool for countries -like Vietnam- that wish to develop their pharmaceutical sector by attracting foreign investors.","PeriodicalId":403361,"journal":{"name":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2021-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Investment Arbitration in the pharmaceutical sector raises some specificities. Regarding jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals, it is questionable whether the registration of a patent abroad or a patent license granted to a foreign partner constitutes an investment. Similarly, as health products are not ordinary goods, arguments according to which marketing authorizations or monopolies granted constitute an investment are real issues. On the merits, the invalidation of a patent, the refusal or withdrawal of a marketing authorization or the decision of a state authority to end a monopoly can be analyzed as a violation of some of the commitments made by States in the treaties they conclude. The aim of this study is to address these questions thanks to the awards already rendered, making it a useful tool for countries -like Vietnam- that wish to develop their pharmaceutical sector by attracting foreign investors.
大型制药公司和投资仲裁
医药行业的投资仲裁提出了一些特殊性。关于仲裁法庭的管辖权,在国外注册专利或授予外国伙伴专利许可是否构成投资是值得怀疑的。同样,由于保健产品不是普通商品,因此认为获得销售许可或垄断构成投资的论点是真正的问题。就案情而言,一项专利的无效、一项销售授权的拒绝或撤回,或国家当局决定终止一项垄断,都可以分析为违反了各国在其缔结的条约中所作的一些承诺。这项研究的目的是通过已经提供的奖励来解决这些问题,使其成为像越南这样希望通过吸引外国投资者来发展其制药部门的国家的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信