Suspension of the Exercise of Voting Rights – A Step towards Deterrent and Consistent Sanctioning of EU Transparency Requirements?

K. Sørensen, Mette Neville
{"title":"Suspension of the Exercise of Voting Rights – A Step towards Deterrent and Consistent Sanctioning of EU Transparency Requirements?","authors":"K. Sørensen, Mette Neville","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2958677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the adoption of Directive 2013/50/EU, the Member States have been required to introduce the sanction of suspending the exercise of the voting rights of shareholders who fail to notify their major shareholdings in accordance with the national rules that implement the Transparency Directive (Directive 2004/109/EC). Directive 2013/50/EU does not regulate in detail how such suspension should be implemented, nor its consequences, so it is hardly surprising that its implementation varies widely. This article shows where the major differences lie. Directive 2013/50/EU is intended to set a minimum standard, but it is concluded that the wide differences in its implementation may mean that the minimum standard set by the Directive with regard to the suspension of voting rights may be said to very low. This does not necessary mean that the harmonisation is a failure, as it is the total mix of sanctions required by the Directive that should set the minimum level. However, as the Commission considers the suspension of the exercise of voting rights to be a particularly important sanction, it may be presumed that it expected this sanction to be implemented with more teeth than appears to be the case.","PeriodicalId":171289,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2958677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the adoption of Directive 2013/50/EU, the Member States have been required to introduce the sanction of suspending the exercise of the voting rights of shareholders who fail to notify their major shareholdings in accordance with the national rules that implement the Transparency Directive (Directive 2004/109/EC). Directive 2013/50/EU does not regulate in detail how such suspension should be implemented, nor its consequences, so it is hardly surprising that its implementation varies widely. This article shows where the major differences lie. Directive 2013/50/EU is intended to set a minimum standard, but it is concluded that the wide differences in its implementation may mean that the minimum standard set by the Directive with regard to the suspension of voting rights may be said to very low. This does not necessary mean that the harmonisation is a failure, as it is the total mix of sanctions required by the Directive that should set the minimum level. However, as the Commission considers the suspension of the exercise of voting rights to be a particularly important sanction, it may be presumed that it expected this sanction to be implemented with more teeth than appears to be the case.
暂停行使投票权-迈向对欧盟透明度要求的威慑和一致制裁的一步?
随着2013/50/EU指令的通过,成员国已被要求根据实施透明度指令(指令2004/109/EC)的国家规则,对未通知其主要股权的股东实施暂停行使投票权的制裁。指令2013/50/EU并没有详细规定这种暂停应该如何实施,也没有规定其后果,所以它的实施差异很大也就不足为奇了。本文展示了主要的不同之处。指令2013/50/EU旨在设定最低标准,但结论是,其实施的巨大差异可能意味着指令所设定的关于暂停投票权的最低标准可以说是非常低的。这并不一定意味着协调是失败的,因为它是指令所要求的制裁的总体组合,应该设定最低水平。但是,由于委员会认为暂停行使表决权是一项特别重要的制裁,因此可以推定,委员会预期这项制裁的执行力度会比实际情况更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信