Comparative Analysis on Corporate Strategy of B2C E-Commerce in China: The Cases of JD.Com and Tmall

Leran Guan, K. Kim
{"title":"Comparative Analysis on Corporate Strategy of B2C E-Commerce in China: The Cases of JD.Com and Tmall","authors":"Leran Guan, K. Kim","doi":"10.16980/jitc.14.1.201802.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main B2C business modes in China are the self-run e-commerce mode represented by JD.com and the platform-based e-commerce mode represented by Tmall. As the two biggest e-commerce enterprises in China, JD.com and Tmall have been sustainably competing with each other. The purpose of this research was to compare the corporate strategies of these B2C enterprises and point out the necessary focuses when formulating their corporate strategies. External and internal environmental analyses were used to analyze and compare the corporate strategies of JD.com and Tmall. Hypotheses related to the impacts of Technology, Brand, Logistics and the Commodity Service of the two enterprises on customer loyalty and recommendation were formulated. A questionnaire survey was administered to customers, and the hypotheses were tested through regression analysis and t-test using SPSS 23.0. The results showed that Commodity Service positively affected the customer loyalty and recommendation both in the two enterprises. Furthermore, the logistics competitiveness of JD.com is significantly better than that of Tmall.","PeriodicalId":370988,"journal":{"name":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.14.1.201802.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main B2C business modes in China are the self-run e-commerce mode represented by JD.com and the platform-based e-commerce mode represented by Tmall. As the two biggest e-commerce enterprises in China, JD.com and Tmall have been sustainably competing with each other. The purpose of this research was to compare the corporate strategies of these B2C enterprises and point out the necessary focuses when formulating their corporate strategies. External and internal environmental analyses were used to analyze and compare the corporate strategies of JD.com and Tmall. Hypotheses related to the impacts of Technology, Brand, Logistics and the Commodity Service of the two enterprises on customer loyalty and recommendation were formulated. A questionnaire survey was administered to customers, and the hypotheses were tested through regression analysis and t-test using SPSS 23.0. The results showed that Commodity Service positively affected the customer loyalty and recommendation both in the two enterprises. Furthermore, the logistics competitiveness of JD.com is significantly better than that of Tmall.
中国B2C电子商务企业战略比较分析——以京东和天猫为例
中国B2C的主要商业模式是以京东为代表的自营电子商务模式和以天猫为代表的平台型电子商务模式。作为中国最大的两家电子商务企业,京东和天猫一直在相互竞争。本研究的目的是比较这些B2C企业的企业战略,并指出在制定企业战略时需要注意的重点。通过外部和内部环境分析,对京东和天猫的企业战略进行分析和比较。提出了两家企业的技术、品牌、物流和商品服务对顾客忠诚和推荐的影响假设。对客户进行问卷调查,运用SPSS 23.0软件进行回归分析和t检验,对假设进行检验。结果表明,商品服务对两家企业的顾客忠诚度和推荐都有正向影响。此外,京东的物流竞争力明显优于天猫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信