RESPONSIBILITIES OF DEED LAND BUILDERS OFFICERS (PPAT) BUY SELL IN MAKING DEED LAND DISPUTE (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018)

Mugiyatno Mugiyatno, Amin Purnawan, Achmad Sulchan
{"title":"RESPONSIBILITIES OF DEED LAND BUILDERS OFFICERS (PPAT) BUY SELL IN MAKING DEED LAND DISPUTE (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018)","authors":"Mugiyatno Mugiyatno, Amin Purnawan, Achmad Sulchan","doi":"10.30659/akta.v7i1.7899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to analyze 1) Liability Land Deed Official (PPAT) in the manufacture of the deed of sale of land. 2) .Menganalisis the validity of the deed of sale made by PPAT.3). Analyzing the legal consequences Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018 against the Land Deed Official (PPAT) who manufacture a deed of sale of land disputes.The approach method in this research is the empirical jurisdiction. Specifications of this research is descriptive analysis. The source of the data used is primary and secondary data. The primary source is the Supreme Court decision number 826K / Pdt / 2018, while secondary data sources are taken from books and other related iteratorr, obtained through interviews and literature, while data analysis is a descriptive analytic. The method of data collection is the engineering library (library research).Results of the research results can be concluded: 1) Obligation PPAT is a deed as evidence has implemented a legal act of buying and selling, and registered under the name of the office to Pertanahan.2) Validity of PPAT Deed governed and determined by the current Minister of National Land Agency, it is affirmed in Article 21 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 which states that the PPAT deed made in the prescribed form of the National Land Agency. 3). The legal consequences Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018 is the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land Disputes number 186/2015 and certificate of land with 1394 numbers became invalid / void and not legally binding and PPAT and Land Agency may be penalized for committed an unlawful act.Keywords : offense, purchase agreement, land deed official","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v7i1.7899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze 1) Liability Land Deed Official (PPAT) in the manufacture of the deed of sale of land. 2) .Menganalisis the validity of the deed of sale made by PPAT.3). Analyzing the legal consequences Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018 against the Land Deed Official (PPAT) who manufacture a deed of sale of land disputes.The approach method in this research is the empirical jurisdiction. Specifications of this research is descriptive analysis. The source of the data used is primary and secondary data. The primary source is the Supreme Court decision number 826K / Pdt / 2018, while secondary data sources are taken from books and other related iteratorr, obtained through interviews and literature, while data analysis is a descriptive analytic. The method of data collection is the engineering library (library research).Results of the research results can be concluded: 1) Obligation PPAT is a deed as evidence has implemented a legal act of buying and selling, and registered under the name of the office to Pertanahan.2) Validity of PPAT Deed governed and determined by the current Minister of National Land Agency, it is affirmed in Article 21 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 which states that the PPAT deed made in the prescribed form of the National Land Agency. 3). The legal consequences Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018 is the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land Disputes number 186/2015 and certificate of land with 1394 numbers became invalid / void and not legally binding and PPAT and Land Agency may be penalized for committed an unlawful act.Keywords : offense, purchase agreement, land deed official
土地契约建造人员买卖契约纠纷中的责任(最高法院第826 K / Pdt / 2018号判决分析)
本研究的目的是分析1)责任土地契据官员(PPAT)在土地买卖契约的制造。2)对ppat买卖契约的效力进行分析。分析最高法院第826 K / Pdt / 2018号判决对制造土地买卖契约纠纷的土地契约官员的法律后果。本研究采用的方法是实证管辖。本研究的具体内容是描述性分析。使用的数据来源是主要和次要数据。主要数据来源为最高法院第826K / Pdt / 2018号判决书,次要数据来源为书籍和其他相关文献,通过访谈和文献获得,数据分析为描述性分析。数据收集的方法是工程图书馆(library research)。研究结果可归纳为:1)义务PPAT是一份契据,作为实施买卖法律行为的证据,并以pertanahan办公室的名义注册。2)PPAT契据的有效性由现任国家土地局部长管辖和确定。肯定在第二十一条(1)款政府监管37号1998即PPAT全国土地契约规定的形式制造机构。3)。最高法院的判决没有法律后果。826 K / Pdt / 2018的买卖契约是土地纠纷数量186/2015和土地有1394数字证书成为无效/无效,不具有法律约束力和PPAT和土地机构可能惩罚犯了一个非法的行为。关键词:犯罪,购买协议,地契官员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信